IN THE US.  DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DIVISION, STATE OF ILLINOIS.  201 S. Vine st ste 218   Urbana IL, 61801

DATED: January 4, 2011

CASE 10-2277                                 A case originating as Champaign Circuit                                                       court/ Urbana IL;     Case 10 MR 766

JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR
2191 COUNTY ROAD 2500 E.
ST. JOSEPH IL 61873
my electronic file is kept at www.justtalking3.info
VS.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as represented by:
the federal bureau of investigation
935 Pennsylvania ave NW Washington DC 20535-0001

SUBPOENA BRIEF

PROOF OF SERVICE

IT IS HEREBY DECLARED,   I, JAMES F. OSTERBUR     HAVE MAILED A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THESE COURT FILINGS, WITH THE PROPER POSTAGE ATTACHED IN THE US MAIL SERVICE/ or UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,     ON THIS DAY.
In accordance with federal rules of civil procedure; rule 4, section (i) rule one service upon the US shall be effected: sections A, B, & C
summoned as well in this case 10-2277 
the Solicitor General   ROOM 5614, Department of Justice,
950 Pennsylvania ave, NW   Washington DC 20530-0001
the Attorney General   US dept of Justice 10th and Constitution avenues NW   Washington DC 20530
US attorney for the central district of IL     201 S.  Vine   ste 218  Urbana IL 61801 / us attorney

 

     IN THE US.  DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DIVISION, STATE OF ILLINOIS.  201 S. Vine st ste 218   Urbana IL, 61801

DATED: January 5, 2011

CASE 10-2277                                 A case originating as Champaign Circuit                                                       court/ Urbana IL;     Case 10 MR 766

JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR
2191 COUNTY ROAD 2500 E.
ST. JOSEPH IL 61873
my electronic file is kept at www.justtalking3.info
VS.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as represented by:
the federal bureau of investigation
935 Pennsylvania ave NW Washington DC 20535-0001

Record sent

PROOF OF SERVICE

IT IS HEREBY DECLARED,   I, JAMES F. OSTERBUR     HAVE MAILED A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THESE COURT FILINGS, WITH THE PROPER POSTAGE ATTACHED IN THE US MAIL SERVICE/ or UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,     ON THIS DAY.
In accordance with federal rules of civil procedure; rule 4, section (i) rule one service upon the US shall be effected: sections A, B, & C
summoned as well in this case 10-2277 
the Solicitor General   ROOM 5614, Department of Justice,
950 Pennsylvania ave, NW   Washington DC 20530-0001
the Attorney General   US dept of Justice 10th and Constitution avenues NW   Washington DC 20530
US attorney for the central district of IL     201 S.  Vine   ste 218  Urbana IL 61801 / us attorney
For the purpose of continuity and legal requirements/ the record not yet called for by the judiciary is now sent to the three participants listed by federal rules as necessary. 


The FBI is summoned to court by me/ rules summon the rest.  The difference is: that these three are in fact a part of trial/ rather than specific defendants in this trial.
The foundation of merit is simply:   the courts throughout state and federal systems of so-called justice HAVE ACTED without honesty/ have conceived with prejudice against the first amendment and state of IL constitutions a rebellion against the people of both the state and federal governments.  NO MAN or woman is “the government”: these are just employees hired to do a job.  Consequently there is no immunity outside the law.  Rather the law can be conceived of as accusing the various levels of judiciary and subsequent lawyers as “traitorous”/ when their intent is to deny constitutional authority and replace it with their own desires or demands.  Such is the reality of those whom the rules have summoned.  They did not work for the people/they served the “rich and powerful” in trials stated.  Rather than the democracy called WE THE PEOPLE.   THAT makes them potentially targets of an FBI probe; and whatever consequence that might bring. To be included in the process that decides if a probe should be conducted;   is then NOT fair/ as they would be, or could be placed on trial for themselves.
The question to be decided:   IS THIS, OR MORE DISTINCTLY ARE THESE ACTIONS COMMENSURATE WITH THE EXPECTATIONS OF JUSTICE, FOR THIS STATE OF ILLINOIS, OR THIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?   JUSTICE is not “the whim or decision of a judge” outside the law.  Justice is the fair and deliberate decision/ that proves we are equals under the law.  The law decides; but do to the frailty of human traits, the judge is assigned to understand the relationship between what is law, and what is fair to us all, as best we can.  In these cases: the law has been abandoned, the judge assigned himself to be “ruler”/ and that is traitorous against the USA, and this state of IL.  We the people, are a democracy that shall not be ruled/ but by the law.
What is rebellion against the United States, the state of IL or its people:   if not open denial of the law/ a blockade through conspiracy that clearly identifies collusion and the organization of gang warfare against the rights and foundations of this “our government” as is the truth of founding agreements among the people that this is, WHO WE ARE/ who we shall become?
The record sent to the three by rule/ have been sent to the FBI by the initial mailing.  It is up to the three, to assure themselves, through court documents that nothing has been left out or added.  As there is absolutely no intent to do so, and my files at this point in this case have been random; so I am not entirely certain of “absolutely same”.  Do check if you care.