US SUPREME COURT
to the clerk; Kyle Ratcliff
from James F. Osterbur
re: the extraordinary writ and your response dated: October 13, 2011
we begin your indiscretion and failure by looking at the letter copied and sent in this return to you from Ruth Jones, the previous clerk in charge of “pro se litigation”. If this is not your title then you do not belong in this case.
If you do belong in this case then the letter from Ruth Jones will remind you that the fee for this extraordinary writ was in fact paid, and is in the possession of Ms Jones as the letter states. Therefore the rule 38a was complied with. Every rule and letter of the rule in 33.1 was also completed and perfected in fact/ proving you are detailing what cannot be considered a complaint within the parameters of law. Therefore in defiance of the rule of law and that is obstruction of justice.
Rule 20.2 indicates quote: that I shall include “all contentions in support of the petition shall be included in the petition.” The complaint of rule 14 is inconsequential and invalid as rule 20.2 demands of you “insofar as applicable”.
The relief sought according to rule 20: “is of an extraordinary matter” being specifically the judiciary as is proven in courtroom after courtroom both state and nation HAVE REFUSED AND FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW THAT IS CONSTITUTIONAL REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES. Which means the courtroom of this state and this nation are filled with criminals instead of judges. That fact is extraordinary/ that reality asserts and removes ANY tolerance for the assumption of fools: that a rule controls constitutional law. It does not. Nor does a clerk consist of a blockade against this democracy and its legal right of authority and accountability against the judiciary itself/ against the political employees who refuse accountability/ or any other clerk or fixture of those who do represent the liars, thieves, and cheats who have so deliberately wrecked the nation with absolute anarchy and tyranny from within. In a nation filled with traitors, you have become “a rat in the trap”. The one sacrificed, so the rest can go free.
Because the issues represented here have now increased to the evidence of traitors/ the reality of anarchy/ and the deception and disease of rebellion against this nation called WE THE PEOPLE. Not you the traitors who have rebelled against us/ and now believe you can be rulers instead of employees. The question becomes: how best do we return this government to ourselves?
The answer relies upon the simple truth: that the law itself shall or must protect us/ from those who believe themselves to be rulers. That law is a constitutional guarantee called redress. That law is NOT SUBJECT to a clerk of the court, nor his assertion of irrelevant and foolish assumptions; that constitutional rights can be discarded with the failure of rules, the traitorous acts of men or women. They cannot. Rather the evidence proves those who do insist upon standing guard against this democracy/ acting as an enemy against this nation called WE THE PEOPLE/ or in aid of the tyranny of fools who believe themselves to be gods. Should indeed find themselves in prison/ for a very long period of time.
You owe me a docketed case in the US SUPREME COURT/ because that is the law. That is my constitutional right, and it is not subject to a rule of the court. My guaranteed constitutional right has been denied by the judiciary in court after court proven with evidence beyond any doubt. Repeatedly, and that is the decision of the judiciary itself bound in a conspiracy to deny this people and me: MY LEGAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENSHIP/ MY DEMAND FOR TRUTH; ACCOUNTABILITY; AND REDRESS; IN GOVERNMENT. My demand FOR THE LAW; outweighs all consideration or construction of what a rule has the authority to do. MY COMMAND, that the conspiracy of both federal and state of IL officials in government at every stage shall be stopped: is not frivolous or failure to advise (you had your opportunity to comply). It is NOW TIME FOR THE LAW to enforce itself, and prove who does own this nation; we the people/ or those who traitorous acts have proven rebellion against us: an enemy in our midst. The writ of certiorari HAS been reviewed by the judiciary in this state and nation: they have refused FIRST AMENDMENT LAW, THE LEGAL RIGHT OF REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES/ the people’s authority, to rule themselves.
That failure is the evidence plain and simple of traitors in the court.
Your choice is: to review the two individual writs I return to you/ both extraordinary and certiorari. AND BE VERY SPECIFIC about what is clearly and without doubt a failure that would represent a flaw in this demand for democratic authority of the people by redress. Be certain, because if you fail, & the people themselves rise: you too will be on trial for treason.