Www.justtalking.info

In the United States Supreme Court

1 first st. se DC. 20543

dated: 8/ 13/07	docket # not yet provided

WRIT OF CERTIORARI

JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR VS USA/ STATE OF IL

in re; The state court of champaign county IL refused to file a verdict in the case 06 MR 726/ they refused the law, and did not file a verdict until months had passed, beyond the time limits required of this court. Did not notify me even at that time that a verdict had been given, and have not yet notified me of any movement by this court. They did not do their duty/ they did not achieve justice by any means or attempt/ they hid and refused the law.

In re; the federal court for the central district of IL/ located in Urbana IL. Trial 07-2040 the federal court having lost its battle with the law/ chose to throw the case out, without law. A clear denial of due process and the rights, immunities, and pledges of the constitution to every citizen.

In re; the federal appeals court, for the 7th district/ located in Chicago IL. Has refused the law, and attempted to "sucker me into a situation" whereby they could penalize me without restraint/ by reducing the case & my filings with the court IN MY CASE. By reducing the clear intent of the case/ changing the litigants being reviewed / and orchestrating the theft of my rights as a litigant before the law. These have acted with impunity to the law/ believing they are above the law, and without respect for this litigant or the law.

in re; THE CURRENT LIES, of the supreme court OR its clerk/ as demonstrated by the letter attached to the return of the writ of certiorari James Frank Osterbur Vs the USA/ STATE OF IL stamped, received by the clerk on Aug 7, 2007

as defined by appellate case 07-2299 Therein the letter of the court , dated 5/23/07 asserts the various papers received on May 22, 2007 fail to comply with the rules of this court and are herewith returned.........and I have 90 days to refile a petition with the court.

As clearly stated by the court, and available for review on www.justtalking.info They were informed of the lack of respect by the court of appeals, the federal district court, and the state court; For their review of procedures in justice "by their managers", and their position as "protectors of the people". They knew of problems defined by these cases/ they admit that the papers received were not a writ of certiorari; and by my definition merely notification to the court, of troubles with their subordinate managers of the business called law. They know it could not be a writ of certiorari until a judgment; whether honorable or dishonorable; had been given/ as a writ is against such a judgment. They so prove by including the words "your case must first be reviewed by a US court of appeals". They chose not to do anything at all/ with regard to their lower counterparts, the employees under their control. Thereby abandoning their responsibilities, just like any other corporate board.

HAVING SAID that; the alternate review of these actions as allowed by rules of procedure state: A petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is entered will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance, as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice, and to require immediate determination in this court. 28 U.S.C. 2101 (e).

Thereby if the court truly believed that this was a writ, even though no such notice was given/ then they determined the cases presented for review were not "of imperative public importance"; The fact that, we are bankrupt/ threatened with extermination/ starvation/ etc. Not important to them, even though crisis is still a few moments away. The fact that the court is in disgrace; of no concern at all. Let them state their stance/ and their opinion shall be noted and filed.

Today, in their attempt to scurry under the protection of a time limit that does not exist/ they assert that a writ was asked for 83 days ago. It was not/ however time still exists, and this will not disappear so easily as stupidity believes. The question to the court is then simply: WHY do you despise the law? WHY do you despise and degrade justice with such pathetic disgrace? File this case/ answer the questions of warranty to the people of the United States of America. Do we have a guaranteed right to due process. Do we have a guaranteed legal right within the first amendment of the constitution. Do we have a sovereign authority over the court as WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Do we have immunity from the court interfering in the LAW/ when an amendment guarantee is involved. Does the court have an inherent and real obligation to protect the citizens of the USA by demanding "good behavior" from its employees/ and penalizing those who choose "bad behaviors"; and what are the limits that rule these complaints. DO WE HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTECT OURSELVES IN COURT From those who have clearly by the evidence of failure DISRUPTED, THREATENED, AND CONTROLLED OUR LIVES without warrant able reason. DO WE HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTECT OURSELVES FROM THOSE WHO CAN DESTROY US ALL, AND THE WORLD BESIDES, in less than 30 minutes on any given day/ at any given time or reason of insanity. DO WE HAVE A RIGHT, to protect our future, by demanding what we need to survive shall not be trashed, consumed in disgrace and gluttony, or any other such measure that means the children and all life shall be assassinated.

Prove this is not important.

FILE THIS CASE, AND PROCEED with all necessary speed/ gathering lawyers for the people/ producing advertizing to the people and information/ and creating the sanctity of law ; whereby only the truth shall be heard, and the intentional lies punished. HENCEFORTH this case is joined to the trial presented to the supreme court James F. Osterbur vs USA & STATE OF IL under the terms of original jurisdiction.

Review of the appellate case 07-2299 is returned unchanged. It contains opinions and orders that fail the law.

JURISDICTION is proven, by the fact that each of the lower courts have evaded the law/ and the law is judge, not an employee of the courtroom of the United States of America. The LAW has not been dealt with/ the first amendment has NOT been answered; and the sovereign and immune rights of the citizen of the USA has been tampered with. The lower courts fail/ that leaves only the supreme court of the United States to answer the questions of rights, threats, and fundamental ownership of the United States of America as WE THE PEOPLE. These are federal questions under the law/ thereby pendant jurisdiction is granted for both the state and federal questions.

Do your duty/ support your oath, and your country. DEFEND your job.

Article 3 section 1 the judicial power shall of the USA shall be vested in one supreme court... The lower courts have all answered/ and stated by the evidence: they cannot deal with this question under the law. Thereby the supreme court shall answer for the nation/ the court system of the USA/ and the people. This is a controversy between citizen and both state and federal government/ a clear adversarial proceeding wherein the lower courts have defined and declared: they cannot hear this question/ it is too much for them to bear. Their failure, is not a preclusion to the fact, that the first amendment as written is LAW, and a legal right, as written. The lower courts absolved themselves from subject matter jurisdiction, the LAW, and the intent of the constitution itself. And I have a personal right to the law, and its legal ramifications/ irregardless of the liars and thieves who try to steal it from me. The LAW RULES, or the courtroom is in violation of itself. And in contempt, for breaking their oath/ and failing their duty, to the people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Establish this trial of accountability in government, both state and federal; prove competency, and truth. And conform the first amendment of the US constitution to its rightful place as "power to WE THE PEOPLE". And establish the parameters of "good behavior" versus bad/ and the penalties demanded of a judge.