IN THE UNITED STATES
James F. Osterbur FEDERAL COURT
2191 cr 2500 e 201 S. Vine,
Vs CASE #____05-2038___
DATED__2/11/05__
Carle Clinic Inc.
602 W. University,
Carle inc
611 W. Park,
&
the American medical assoc (AMA)
Chicago, IL60610
&
the State of
states attorney regional office
1776 E. Washington,
&
the
201 S. Vine,
& by default [someone must represent
university interests and decisions/ and these are here]
the
office of the University counsel
258 Henry Administration bldg
a case re-filed and now in 4 parts within this document combined.
CASE 05-2038
DATED 2/18/05
IN BRIEF : I am here to claim my right of redress of grievances according to the 1st amendment of the United States Constitution. QUOTE: "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
The term assembly is this court case/ the grievances are therein listed. The reality is NO court is superior to the 1st amendment/ NO interpretation can be considered "more peaceable" than the courtroom/ and NO bastard official can claim these grievances are anything less than a true case intended as written, within the 1st amendment. And required by the court to be dealt with, as a duty and a respect for the people. I am here because the officials of the court and the government, have not been able to do their jobs. I am here, because I will not let the planet, the nation, or the people simply die without a fight. We have now entered the purposes of this "trial for life"/ simply to create the necessary circumstances to establish a critical discussion of reality/ NOT my reality/ NOT your reality/ but OUR reality. Therefore by design, the need for public involvement/ the reality of lawyers for the public/ and the fundamental truth are all necessary to let us survive are submitted in this court as demanded by the constitution.
Therefore I DO petition the court to
establish this redress of grievances by proclaiming it a "class action
suit, and presenting lawyers, and whatever money that is necessary for its
purposes: which are defending life, the nation, and the world". Failure to
do so, explains the simple truth: that when the economy fails/ you have no
where to go/ when the terrorist or starvation or over-population or loss of
resources [7 billion people use and abuse MANY things] or loss of water or
contamination of water (evidence is enclosed) by earthquake or just plain
"too much" or simply "the mass murder you are truly
committing" on the young or unborn, because you are stealing their
resources, only to throw it in the garbage. And so on. Look carefully at what
you do, for remember these words if you abandon duty/ you will learn that
genetic structure is not a toy, the fact that your body forms as it does is not
an accident, and when that critical link that holds the order or controls the
discipline suddenly disappears, you and the world around you are extinct. And
this is only the beginning. Think carefully before you choose to die; because
unless we as humanity change, we as a entire planet surely will soon.
I am now through talking/ I am now through
working alone for the survival of life. Therefore TO ALL INVOLVED listen
carefully: this is not a personal case, it merely represents a personal case/
every issue involved is national in scope. YOU are instructed at this time: I will
only appear in "personal court" to establish the possibility of an
appeal/ no argument will be given. Therefore unless the judge decides on
accepting his or her duty to allow a redress of grievances, and present this
redress to the public/ there will be NO reason to accrue lawyer billing against
me. ASK THE JUDGE, beforehand/ he or she will know, and I give permission/ no
harm to you will occur. If on the other hand this goes to public trial, people
will present for the people, and they will argue against you, with my help. The
purpose of "the possibility to appeal"/ will include ONLY the
This trial is in direct confrontation with the participants who have made all the threats to life possible. This trial is to establish a discussion, it is not to attack anyone. Where the court fails, the law attacks, not me. I am through with court apart from these terms/ although I will not stop simply educating as it is possible to do. The death of the planet is at stake, I can do no less/ it is a duty. Therefore understand me well, I do not "give up"/ but I do say at this point I must be joined or I have done my best, and you may die, if you do so choose.
For information purposes, I am sending a disk with the information that will
be on the trialforlife.info site at a later time. It is necessary for me, to
find a web assistant for that job. For your information, I tell you now, that
soon when the site is transformed/ there will be a detailed drawing of 2
engines to replace all piston style engines currently used. There is herein a
description of a true energy recovery machine and a drawing and details will
follow. There will be a new furnace and perhaps more/ all free for the purpose
of this work/ to establish true discussion. It is not "foolish"/ it
is the reality if the world dies, or sinks into armageddon/ then what good is
money? You are sure to believe it cannot be/ I say to you only, take a look at
the materials sent to you, and reconsider.
First part
a case examining the critical relationship between patient and medicine/ its legal complications/ and its demand for public utility status.
A case examining the critical consumption of individual rights when compared to a national business enterprise, strictly devoted to "medicine by their values"/ not ours. The legal implication is simply; when the majority provider of any business practice or service or product maintains a litigation service for the direct benefit of membership financial gain and fundamental control/ then all manner of price fixing and industry control results. When the majority providers of any business practice, or service, or product establish the fundamental parameters of pricing for all industry representatives/ then a requirement exists for consumer protection. When the majority providers of any business practice or service or product have so bound together that they now comprise "an army, of litigators" then the term, anti-trust laws apply. Quote (AMA web site www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/4618.html): "the litigation center is an unincorporated association between the AMA and the state medical societies, organized to coordinated litigation within the federation. Its purpose is to concentrate legal resources in filing
lawsuits or amicus curiae briefs in cases
of general interest to physicians and to share information and resources in
response to emerging legal issues. ....."
JURISDICTION: IS ANCILLARY
from me/ without religion/ a case defending life.
Discipline says: if you neither do your duty,
nor honor your work/ then your life fills with the insanity of your failures,
because your soul does not love you. Love is the existence of a friendship
conceived by soul. This is a spiritual saying, not a threat/ but a reality
designed by truth.
BRIEF
RE: a legal action establishing the question/ does the medical profession own the primary control of billing against the public citizen: or do we/I have a right to professional and accurate information that FUNDAMENTALLY informs and accurately reflects exactly who wants this money and why? In a timely fashion, where deception is not the clear intent/ in like accord with all other business {meaning fair and competent disclosure of what is expected/ prior to any agreement to pay}? It is OUR bill/ it is their request. Request means: in exchange for services and materials, I do expect this as fair compensation, as all billing exists within an inherently unreasonable, anti-competitive behavior. Whereas, Reality states/ every billing is not fair.
A legal action establishing the question/
does a medical association, have a right to control, disguise, or decide what
is equitable, [even if it only describes what shall be billed together, or
more] to the patients of medical establishments across the nation? Is this not
a clear and conscious collusion, perpetrated against the patient: who benefits/
it is not the patient. The assertion of medicine, "we shall all do this
together, under these terms" is an orchestrated covenant, to control and
manipulate what shall be done, and as a consequence how it shall be priced/
thereby it can be considered a conspiracy engaging price control. If this is a
monopoly and the intrinsic and illegal definition of price control, by its
reality and orchestration/ then we the patients are franchised and sold by the
medical industry: not as patients but are, "sold as slaves". The
financial reality is clear, the medical establishment is in control, and we
have no say. The question to be constructed, the reality to be questioned is
simply: is a coding convention or standard, a tool in any form, for the direct
control of pricing, or the direct control of what will be priced and how:
irregardless of a cumulative purpose, or a direct agreement in price, is this
an established control of that product: when viewed on a national level? The
assertions of administrative ease notwithstanding, the reality is a distinct
composition for direct comparison of any service, at any facility nationwide;
the ability to then in a truly monopolized market/ to claim this is necessary,
because they do it. This is not "customer shopping"/ this is
monopoly, due to the consequences involved. Therefore a very strict
interpretation of anti-trust laws are required. WHERE is the consumer
protection information to buffet or give legal contract rights? IT IS NOT in
the consumer's hand/ it is not available without court, legal expert, lawyers,
and great expense/ in a place where our legitimate complaint will be dismissed
as "below reasonable standards/ for the sole purpose of propagating a
frivolous lawsuit for financial gain".
ARGUMENT begins as a development of 4 separate billings for a single 1 hour visit to the environments of Carle Inc. This unfortunate experience, that I suspect was the result of "mold laden walls" in the building I was working on. Resulted in my appearance at the carle facility on Mattis ave in champaign/ the closest medical facility I was aware of. They sent me by arrow ambulance a carle subsidiary to carle foundation hospital, where I was subsequently released within the hour. It is my suspicion and theory the oxygen given en route arrested the condition and I improved.
As expected, I received billing from the hospital/ which I paid. I received billing from arrow ambulance/ which I paid. I received billing from "the doctors" which I paid. Then a week or two later I received billing from another set of doctors; and decided THIS IS INAPPROPRIATE, because it steals from me my right to review in accordance with my need for the information/ prior to payment based upon the merits of the price. Not only am I billed 4 separate times for the same entry to their environment, I am billed by the clinic with their staff situated in their hospital [but it is called a separate entity, with separate rights and billing procedures]. After I have paid the doctors, the hospital, and the ambulance, where is my leverage for understanding the bill/ demanding review of the bill/ forming my honest opinion of the validity of the billing/ and expecting the legitimate request for this billing to be explained to me or altered because it does not reflect the truth about treatment? I have no leverage, as is obvious by my request for clarity and honesty from the clinic: they threaten "the bill collector". EVERY other commercial enterprise proves competent at making certain, its customers have informed consent/ before a billing is due. The medical establishment does everything it can to harass the customer [because medicine provides no room for dealing]/ therefore to un-complicate the larceny and theft: they choose to hide the price, and attack in stages. I DO have a legitimate RIGHT to full disclosure/ prior to any billing being paid. YOU have NO RIGHT to attack (demands for money is an attack, when the value of the service is hidden in stages)/ not by the negligence of separating carle inc, into parcels/ not by the inference of a business right to do so: YOU USE the very same advertizing throughout all "carle inc entities" . THE NAME CARLE is your primary focus on all such attempts. Even the phone book declares you to be the same/ and is intended too. Therefore your clear intent is to claim "all of us". Separation is just a ruse.
Some will argue, that's life/ deal with it. I
say, if I enter within an environment held together by the same organization,
with people that work within the same buildings and all other aspects of a
united organization, that also functions and advertizes as one organization/one
basic campaign. That is dependent upon a single entity description [called
carle], irregardless of the petty and irrelevant excuses they attempt to make,
to claim a separation. Then I am entitled to one single billing. I find this
method of division a simple means to collect more money. It is understood
"the making of money is not the issue/ RATHER the truth and honesty of how
that power over a patient translates as money, IS.
CARLE INC. replies in their letter dec 15, 2004
Their financial supervisor Jodi Hollern
They have reviewed and understand the complaint, no questions to ask. And then state:
CORRESPONDENCE:
letter from Carle Clinic unfortunately neither the logo or the signature came
through using the fine reader scanning program
second
part
RE-FILED AS THE TRIAL FOR LIFE, set in the
mail February 18, 2005
WE NOW BEGIN
The assertion of a lack of subject matter to
include the
McCulloch v.
The motion to discard my right to re-enter a
courtroom is not only a tyranny opposed not only by the constitution
[irregardless of merit], it is a direct and prejudicial statement disgracing
the value and purpose of the Declaration of Independence and assigns to this
attorney treason. Quote: we hold these truth to be self-evident, that all men
are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness. That TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any
form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the
people to alter or to abolish it, ....." It is clear the
Irregardless, the purpose of his motion to destroy my right to re-enter court is found in paragraph 51 of this case 05-2038 and identified by the web site www.trialforlife.info As he and the court and the other participants were given clear warning. By the actions of the US attorney, it is now necessary to combine the proposed and legal definitions of the www.trialforlife.info Into this case 05-2038 as the US attorney has identified it must be so/ past experience proves collusion exists within the courtroom and no further time shall pass: this trial now begins in full.
Jurisdiction is answered by the competency of
the court to hear a case. This is FEDERAL COURT wherein the
IN THE PRIOR CASE #2: 04-cv 2196
In the consequence of these "first
trial" measurements, wherein the court is asked to proclaim their position
with reference to a first amendment "redress of grievances"/ they
state: the first amendment does not guarantee a federal court forum for
citizens to air any grievance whatsoever. They state : "the claims in this
complaint are wholly insubstantial and frivolous". They state:
"Spares the court from having to entertain.... litigation not reasonably
grounded in federal law".
My complaint and amended complaint herein
enclosed could NOT be a description of greater need for the nation/ clearly and
easily read. This complaint could NOT be more serious and easily identified
with the federally defined evidence declared. The reality of 1st
amendment redress of grievances FITS EXACTLY into the descriptions and
declaration of this complaint. To refuse to litigate according to the demands
of the constitution OR define exactly what constitutes a redress of grievances
[A DISTINCT PART OF THE 1ST AMENDMENT] as requested in the amended
complaint #29, and 30. The courts failure to comply, AND DESCRIBE EXACTLY what
constitutes and identifies my right to a constitutional guarantee/Are the
evidence of failure and subterfuge solicited by the court to evade and disgrace
the constitution itself. Even the most minimal examination of the order,
defines an attempt to use a useless barrage of words, to barricade and refuse
the demand for 1st amendment rights/ the reality of cases, merely
excuses the judge from making his or her own decision/ the truth of false
claims that this is frivolous and insubstantial, fundamentally defines the
court as LIAR and does irreparable harm to the foundations of this government,
and it is clear and certain: they have done it a long time. The assertion of
federal law, could not be more blind/ therefore it is clearly a treason, as the
truth is; federal law begins and ends with the constitutional mandates:
therefore the court is in contempt and accused of criminal behaviors: THEY
STEAL my constitutional rights.
The complain states in its first line, the evidence is the governments own tables "flow of funds/ federal reserve/ table L5. The complaint declares a reality so critical to the nation, that it can cause the death of millions/ the end of the nation itself/ and because of weapons of mass destruction, it is a sign of life ending on earth. These are not unsubstantiated, UNLESS THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS A FRAUD. These are not frivolous, because it is TRUE, AND AFFECTS THE LIVES OF EVERY AMERICAN, and could affect the lives of every person on earth: amended complaint #33 & 34. This action is thoroughly based in federal law/ because all federal law stems only from the realities and descriptions granted by the constitution itself. Therefore the court is in contempt/ and unduly harasses this citizen, stealing his DUE PROCESS TO LAW.
The court is redirected to amended complaint #9,21,25,29, & 30 that to desert your station of duty in times of crisis or pending crisis is at best the sign of a coward/ at worst the reality of a traitor, and a whore [one who betrays the body, for simple and poor rewards]. Amended complaint #4 identifies $520,000.00 dollars is owed by every taxpayer. Therefore among us, there exists a group of people who fully expect to be paid accordingly: IS NOT THE DOLLAR IN YOUR POCKET OR BANK ACCOUNT WORTH SOMETHING? They, who hold all these numbers and call themselves "rich" do expect your work and resources, for whatever they desire. For perspective, if you divide the debt equally to one half the people/ they owe: and then give all the money owed to the other half of the people/ then out of every 2 workers, one would owe the other $ 1,040,000.00 . Because no longer would the 2nd half be required to help pay, they would demand payment. In actual fact, the probability is no more than 75 million people constitute the actual workforce/ as many tax filers are too young or too old, sick, in prison and so forth./ that then doubles your actual work load. This "money" is not only a lie, it is a tragedy allowed and created by very selfish people, where greed not only led the way/ it was worshiped as a god by you, the american citizen. Did you once say, "lets stop and pay this bill/ when it was possible: NO you said shut up/ don't do anything, because I want this money.
There is no such thing as money/ rather money is a measurement of transfer, and you cannot transfer what you do not have or cannot gain. The american dollar is worthless/ because you cannot find the time, the work, or the resources to even consider paying: you are bankrupt. Therefore the judge pretends "no federal authority exists, to hear this complaint, because all of american intends to hide.
The law of supply and demand uses reality to determine "this has been abused, and must be stopped: the price goes up". FREE credit, has disrupted supply and demand, to allow the americans to strip the earth, and destroy countless lives into the future [they need resources too/ NOT your garbage dump, or your failures]. Your ability to survive these lies to date, has been the result of "foreign labor/ the reality that numbers can be stored "like the lottery", because until they are used, they don't matter. Your baby boom of the fifties, have stored and worked hard/ your problem is you have destroyed resources, and they are no longer easy, these people now intend to retire and spend, and not work/ your elderly expect pampering as a baby/ and the world now knows you can't pay. This comes a very few days before your economy disintegrates of its own, because there comes an end to every lie. Your biggest lie, is "you don't have to care about anyone or anything but you". Your biggest failure is, "you are certain the earth is about to be consumed, and you can't stop it/ therefore give me everything NOW".
The court understands full well, exactly what
this case means in the short term/ yet it argues "the complaint does not
establish a sufficient basis to vest this court with subject matter
jurisdiction over the
As to this reality, it is in fact both lie and truth that the court is not sufficient in itself to hear a case such as this against the officials of the land, even the people of this land. HOWEVER this court is thoroughly sufficient to determine a 1st amendment redress of grievances against the nation and send the matter to the US SUPREME COURT as it must go. The fact this court refused to do its job, is the evidence of tyranny, combined with the "skillful fraud" of corruption by rules/ the
method used by attorneys to steal and control the people, and make them slaves/ just as the medical industry, has taught so many others. rules allow the hypocrite to pretend: rules allow the conspiracies of lawyers and judges the grounds to blockade: rules allow the powerful, due to their selfishness, a cause of action based solely upon the laws they bought from the traitors they own. JUSTICE IS NONE OF THESE THINGS. Justice is the decision, that WE ARE EQUAL, and deserve the same dignity and respect, no matter what.
The court attacks justice, it knows not how
to defend it/ because the severity of collusion with power, the selfishness and
bigotry of failures, and the greed of humanity all want something to control.
There is little respect here in
As to the personal letter/ mr. Baker avoids the first part of the letter clarifying this is a choice, [intended for a new and different judge] stating that I have been abused by the court before, at a cost of many thousands of dollars, and to avoid the necessity of bringing the court to trial itself, and dealing with a further mess, because quote "no intent to harm exists"/ I DO require some type of "good faith" commitment from the court, to prove justice is in their mind. The fact that baker has presided over a case of judicial corruption before/ even though it was the federal appeals court that trashed the constitution and produced FRAUD, is an injury to us both. No personal note would have been sent to him: we know each other, through court documents. Instead of integrity, baker uses the personal note in an attempt to degrade my purpose and intent to this litigation; and aspires to suggest "my only real idea is to get something from the court I cannot have: they have the power you know". Baker does not know me well! Or he would understand, and his colleagues who helped him write the order would understand/ NOW there must be a fine imposed upon the court to establish: that pride and arrogance is not acceptable/ the reality thereby expressed within the trial for life, does demand critical examination of the trials associated with me, and a penalty imposed upon the government for their lack of supervision upon the courts , to make it clear/ you the court shall not abuse the citizen, and desert your duty. This should come out of any and all pension funds created for the judicial branch/ let the public decide.
Promised a new judge I ASKED: are you fair, impartial, interested in justice, able to make a decision that represents HONESTY (for the sake of my words, and the reality of what they mean)/ HONOR (for the sake of my intent, and the duty shown) & DIGNITY (for the understanding of the price I will be required to pay, for defending america, from the greatest tragedy to ever befall it). The answer is NO, the court cannot find respect, dignity, honor, or honesty: they choose "this litigation is wholly insubstantial". They choose to hide the corporation and insist that economic failure is a fantasy. They choose to believe the mass insanity of "everyone can LIE, without discipline or order/ everyone is under their power and control. The lie, is not an assumption/ this is a reality of simply choosing to prepare for reality/ for which they would gladly jail me: even though it is their words, which in their documents and orders of the court prove the evidence of treason, and that traitors lie beneath the cover of their robes. You cannot bury the constitution in garbage, and claim to be a patriot, if you do/ then you are clearly a liar.
The court suggests it can find no basis in
subject matter jurisdiction as to the
The court order says, this case is
terminated: in reality the court is now on trial. Think not? Again I tell you
clearly: WE THE PEOPLE is not a farce, not an excuse or a reason/ WE THE PEOPLE
exists as the true meaning or purpose behind every law/ every honest law exists
to protect, grant equality, or determine who is the guarantee: who is the
inheritor: who is your employer: and who rules the country, whether you like it
or not. This is the grant and demand of democracy, this is the power and truth
of democracy. This is a litigant claiming: either prove you are a democracy/ or
prove to the world YOU ARE A LIAR!
THE TRIAL 05-2038
SIMPLE & plain identifies a number of
participants in robbing the nation/ through their greed, the nation falls prey
to its coming catastrophe. They are NOT alone by any means, but exist in this
case as fundamental litigants who shall represent the rest of corporate
1. This case represents trial between man and corporate giant/ page 3, the reality in medicine of an inherently unreasonable, anti-competitive behavior. Where is my government?
2. This case represents trial between man and the monopoly page 3, against the nation whereby one set of people, decide how control and manipulation shall be achieved. Where is my government?
3. This case represents trial between man and the court and its lawyers, displacing rights for the sole purpose of control of the man, page 4. Where is my government?
4. This case represents trial between man, and the courtroom disgrace of legal attempts to hide and distribute blame, while protecting no one but greed alone page 5. Where is my government?
5. This case represents trial between man and the intent to distort billing for the purposes of illicit gain. They use guile and subtlety to abuse and confuse intentionally misleading people for their own control and manipulation of their affairs/ and then take them to court. Page 6 Where is my government?
6. This case represents the need for a "public utility status" for the industry called medicine in all its aspects/ as they prove in every billing, that they are incapable of containing their greed? Where is my government?
7. This case represents trial by manipulation of the court, whereas any single individual is forced to confront many different lawyers in any aspect of a medical trial without help/ without even a courtroom that understands the language. As is evident in that truth, the courtroom also uses language for the express purpose of controlling the litigant for financial gain to its lawyers. Page 7 Where is my government? They are stealing from me.
8. This case represents a conspiracy to manipulate the court and the government because it has attained a level of power over the citizen capable of demanding slavery [the creation of a debt too great to pay]. Page 9 Where is my government?
9. This case asserts, that some types of business are too powerful over the lives of people to remain in private enterprise/ they shall be "public utilities" because the ease of extortion is simply too great, the damage to society too real. Page 10 Where is my government?
10. This case demands critical review of how debt is allowed to be generated. Page 11. Where is my government?
11. Because it is wrong to isolate a set of problems without an alternative and call them wrong, an alternative is provided: for discussion and review page 11
12 this case asserts, NO MORE LIES, if you advertize as one entity then you must be one entity. Page 12 Where is my government?
13. This case seeks a courtroom where medical
realities may be addressed by the people themselves in an environment where
justice is real. Therefore the question is asked: is the courtroom of
14. This case seeks action by the court, to control the utter greed and bastard ways of lawyers seeking "their pot of gold" through medical liability lawsuits/ while people are trampled underneath and medicine is laid waste by their efforts. PAGE 15 WHERE is my Government?
15. This case asserts a hostile possession by the medical establishment, over the rights of the people page 16/ evidence summarized www.federalreserve.gov/ releases. Flow of funds table L.5 Where is my government?
16. This case asserts, where the billing is known, recognized as bad and inferior in all aspects to every other business in America, then the billing must change. Page 18 Where is my government?
17. Demanded herein is the acceptance of employees of their mandate to establish their work and their job in accordance with constitutional guidelines and not be traitors. Page 18 WHERE is my redress of grievances provided by the 1st amendment of the constitution?
18. This case allows, that all criminal consequences for the betrayal of the people by the medical industry may be considered as an addiction which subsequently controlled their ability to find honor/ that does not mean innocent, it means present true change and be free. Page 19
19. This case suggests a new and different means is necessary to control the consequence of this happening again/ WHICH MEANS, the people must be involved in their billing for services and cannot be simple "I don't care". Page 20
20. This case is about JUSTICE FOR ALL, it is
not allowed to be so simple as set between the rules of current failures. There
are many individual issues that are irrelevant at this time/ but are worthy of
court. TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEFEND THE PEOPLE, WITH ME! IT IS YOUR JOB/
IT IS OUR DUTY.
third part
THE TRIAL FOR LIFE
DEFINED BY THE US ATTORNEY, this case set
within the document www.trialforlife.info
IS CALLED "NOW OR NEVER" by the
A short list
1. A case for trial demanding the examination of weapons of mass destruction as "our saviors/ keeping the enemy at bay". Whereas the reality is; even accidental use represents extinction for the planet? WHERE IS MY PROTECTION? WHERE IS MY RIGHT TO SURVIVE? NEGOTIATE AND REMOVE ALL SUCH WEAPONS.
2 a case for trial demanding the critical examination of genetic mutilation and the consequences of that certain failure/ death to all life on earth! Can these who demand mutilation of genetic structure "fix it, when it collapses"/ the answer is they are too stupid to know they are too ignorant to do anything but cry and weep and say "I'm sorry/ I didn't mean too"! WHERE IS MY PROTECTION, WHEN LIFE IS DEAD/ who among you believes this garbage is enough.
3. a case demanding world review of university driven experimentation particularly in physics; where the current threats are fusion [literally lighting the world on fire] by many means. Fusion is atomic fire/ everything atomic is then fuel: HOW will you control it/ or put it out? ANSWER THE QUESTION! WHERE IS MY GOVERNMENT, it is supporting our extinction. WHERE is my 1st amendment redress of grievances/ MY RIGHT TO CONFRONT MY
GOVERNMENT LEGALLY.
4. A case demanding the removal of religion from government/ specifically the religion called evolution. Let the bastard's defend against me.
5. A CASE DEMANDING you shall NOT assassinate the future generations in mass murder, by removing everything they need to survive/ YOU HAVE NO RIGHT! A reality of change. WHERE IS MY GOVERNMENT?
6. A CASE DEMANDING change in the officials of government from "people who vote for me/ to I WILL VOTE FOR MYSELF, on the issues of importance, and these officials shall assure that it is done for me. WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT, and change is required to make this true.
7.a case respecting the truth that the
american dollar is dead. YOU ARE BANKRUPT, but that does not have to mean a
true depression and then war/ it only means expectations WILL CHANGE. Therefore
it accepts the responsibility of discussion to meet and provide these changes
BEFORE the days of mass murder make it impossible. WHERE IS MY GOVERNMENT?
THE REAL TRIAL FOR LIFE BEGINS you can find
it at www.trialforlife.info
The reality of our place in history is, you will NOT be able to hide much longer! When even a few of the consequences you have chosen for yourselves begins to attack you, the american nation/ time will give you only this one brief reprieve from the desperation you will know/ it is this trial. NOT because I say so/ because your reality demands it shall be true. You will decide you direction, I will not. You will decide your commitment to life, I will not. You will choose your fate, by the truth in your words and actions/ for if you begin for justice and life; BUT then turn away, hell shall be MUCH "hotter" because of it. Hell is the truth: defined by: now as you demand/ you shall truly be your own god, and death will not take this away. Why would you choose this? Fully knowing you cannot survive.
I am not here, with this message to bring you tears. Reality says, you have made your own tears/ instead, I am presenting the honesty of your situation, and the reality of your truth: AND THE HOPE that you will live.
The question that presents is simply: why do you not recognize the grave danger you are in? The answer is: because then you could not blame anyone else, and you would be required to admit: you do the things you do, because fear controls your life. It is time to confront these fears/ change what can be changed/ survive if it is possible/ and belong TO GOD if you are wise enough to choose it.
I am here in court for your benefit, NOT for mine. But this time I bring your life or your death with me, the whole nation/ even the world. I TRULY wish it were not so! But truth doesn't lie, and neither do I. You will accept your duty to life, examine your reality, define your truth properly, and choose your destiny
OR
Your own choices will kill you/ because as poor as you are today, a billion more mouths to feed are coming within the next 20 years. You will run out of fertilizers, you are destroying the incubators of the ocean/ changing it forever. You are ruining the earth with callus disregard, and you have chosen weapons of mass destruction as your savior. IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THESE SIMPLE TRUTHS, then you are abandoned as simply "to afraid to live".
To the idiots who say
I am not your enemy/ not your friend either:
merely the messenger. I cannot save you/ I cannot lead you: you must decide
these things individually, and GOD KNOWS How you do choose/ do not pretend, you
will die. If you think I have nothing to say, then read the www.trialforlife.info and show me my
error. IF you cannot, then all you have to refute these words is your own
desire "to be god, rather than life" And you will receive your wish:
as a reality not as your fantasy. There will be no "momentary delusions of
glory/ merely the everyday bludgeoning of life"/ the mutilation everywhere
of death. PRAY THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN, for your whole existence is what GOD HAS
GIVEN TO YOU/ your only participation is what you do with these gifts: what
then happens to you, when they are gone? To the people who cannot believe in
eternity, because your pride will not let you/ I say to you clearly, The
intensities of life are not measurements of the mind/ but truths that will not
be denied. Therefore the intensities of your own life, are the evidence of your
struggle to compete with GOD or your desire to live with GOD. If you
"fight with GOD" then why do you not believe in GOD? How foolish you
are/ as it is true of this very day, your excuses will by you nothing/ your
tears, not even a glance / your begging will merely be too late: you must
choose truth, or you will accept the lie you chose.
A redress of grievances is NOT recognized by the court, they choose failure. Therefore YOU, THE CITIZENS OF AMERICA must decide, if you will face your truths, and live the life you have created in absolute poverty and shame, or by changing become true leaders of this world. IF you refuse these choices, then you will demand revenge and hide in fantasy and worthlessness. Either way your lives are about to change, because all your lies are ending. There are no other choices, for we are too many for any other way/ you cannot run to another place, they, the other nations cannot and will not save you! You are not leaving this planet, or bringing things from there to here.
The purpose of redress is: to have a peaceful, honest, honorable debate under parliamentary order/ that allows the discipline necessary to design and re-design the nation as reality states this must be/ chosen by the people who must live the decisions and do the work. These are NOT political arguments [arguments without VERY serious outcomes]. THIS is the relationship that decides if life shall become extinct on earth. It is not a game/ that is your choice, and this shall NOT be decided by less than the nation itself. Some will laugh and deride this warning as "another end of the world idiot". But truly I do not tell you it is so/ THE EVIDENCE demands this is true. Prove by the evidence, that it is not/ or accept your moment in history and decide.
The meaning of redress in its 1st amendment guarantee is: WE THE PEOPLE shall accept power over you the official we employ, and demand final say, in ANY action we desire. YOU shall not have power over us/ we share. The reality of redress is, the nation is severely threatened and we the people MUST understand, the politician, the police, not the military, or science, or business can or will save you: they created the problem, by not confronting the truth. Therefore redress is our moment in history, to decide what we can do/ if we fail, then we lose; even everything.
The court mocks the nation itself, declares the constitution as useless according to their own whim/ and decides the 1st amendment is MUTE and of no value to anyone. The court has never allowed a redress of grievances/ the court accepts no jurisdiction, because the court is then under the power of the citizen. The intent of the court is thereby criminal, and the words which are used to describe a "good cause" for disputing the rights of the 1st amendment are then a fraud. It is criminal because the court steals my right to due process of law under the 1st amendment/ it chooses to use intimidation, (a long list of useless words) to present a barrier to constitutional guarantee. It uses power and indirect evidence to dispute a right, and conspire against WE THE PEOPLE. Have these rights no value/ they are indeed very precious to all the people who understand them, therefore the court is a thief, and an unrepentant liar.
The first amendment is OUR POSSESSION.
Therefore evidence knows, the degree of the crime comes from the "top"
down/ thereby the
Reality doesn't care about you "humanity"/ you exist not from reality, but from life itself. Truth cannot hear you cry, doesn't care what you think or want, and has no mercy to offer you. This is your truth. Truth is only about order, discipline, and energy. Therefore understand clearly, when you cross the line/ you are DONE, extinction will arrive, and you will have no choice/ because order says it must & energy demand it shall be so. Your critical evidence, and words necessary to confront your existence are identified at www.trialforlife.info And its related links. It doesn't matter what you "think or feel"/ reality says: resources, hate, fear, revenge, and the truth about what 7 billion people in chaos can and will do SHALL DECIDE. Your choice, your only choice is to identify the truth, abandon the lie, and live with honor and honesty. EQUALITY FOR ALL is not just words/ this will be your life, or you will die.
My reality is simply to deliver this message, and live my own life/ I have NO DESIRE to be more for you, than what I currently must provide. This is not fun/ this is not desirable to me. This is necessary: where on earth do you think you or I can hide, from starvation, genetic mutilation, weapons of mass destruction, and all the rest? To those who think "they will prepare and hide", I guarantee, terror will find you/ PREPARE INSTEAD to help the others that all may survive.
Statements short and plain, to begin the
battle and describe the jurisdiction
THE BROAD TOPICS
4. A case demanding the removal of religion from government/ specifically the religion called evolution. Let the bastard's defend against me.
5. A CASE DEMANDING you shall NOT assassinate the future generations in mass murder, by removing everything they need to survive/ YOU HAVE NO RIGHT! A reality of change. WHERE IS MY GOVERNMENT?
6. A CASE DEMANDING change in the officials of government from "people who vote for me/ to I WILL VOTE FOR MYSELF, on the issues of importance, and these officials shall assure that it is done for me. WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT, and change is required to make this true.
7.a case respecting the truth that the
american dollar is dead. YOU ARE BANKRUPT, but that does not have to mean a
true depression and then war/ it only means expectations WILL CHANGE. Therefore
it accepts the responsibility of discussion to meet and provide these changes
BEFORE the days of mass murder make it impossible. WHERE IS MY GOVERNMENT?
THE REAL TRIAL FOR LIFE BEGINS you can find
it at www.trialforlife.info
The reality of our place in history is, you will NOT be able to hide much longer! When even a few of the consequences you have chosen for yourselves begins to attack you, the american nation/ time will give you only this one brief reprieve from the desperation you will know/ it is this trial. NOT because I say so/ because your reality demands it shall be true. You will decide you direction, I will not. You will decide your commitment to life, I will not. You will choose your fate, by the truth in your words and actions/ for if you begin for justice and life; BUT then turn away, hell shall be MUCH "hotter" because of it. Hell is the truth: defined by: now as you demand/ you shall truly be your own god, and death will not take this away. Why would you choose this? Fully knowing you cannot survive.
I am not here, with this message to bring you tears. Reality says, you have made your own tears/ instead, I am presenting the honesty of your situation, and the reality of your truth: AND THE HOPE that you will live.
The question that presents is simply: why do you not recognize the grave danger you are in? The answer is: because then you could not blame anyone else, and you would be required to admit: you do the things you do, because fear controls your life. It is time to confront these fears/ change what can be changed/ survive if it is possible/ and belong TO GOD if you are wise enough to choose it.
I am here in court for your benefit, NOT for mine. But this time I bring your life or your death with me, the whole nation/ even the world. I TRULY wish it were not so! But truth doesn't lie, and neither do I. You will accept your duty to life, examine your reality, define your truth properly, and choose your destiny
OR
Your own choices will kill you/ because as poor as you are today, a billion more mouths to feed are coming within the next 20 years. You will run out of fertilizers, you are destroying the incubators of the ocean/ changing it forever. You are ruining the earth with callus disregard, and you have chosen weapons of mass destruction as your savior. IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THESE SIMPLE TRUTHS, then you are abandoned as simply "to afraid to live".
To the idiots who say
I am not your enemy/ not your friend either:
merely the messenger. I cannot save you/ I cannot lead you: you must decide
these things individually, and GOD KNOWS How you do choose/ do not pretend, you
will die. If you think I have nothing to say, then read the www.trialforlife.info and show me my
error. IF you cannot, then all you have to refute these words is your own
desire "to be god, rather than life" And you will receive your wish:
as a reality not as your fantasy. There will be no "momentary delusions of
glory/ merely the everyday bludgeoning of life"/ the mutilation everywhere
of death. PRAY THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN, for your whole existence is what GOD HAS
GIVEN TO YOU/ your only participation is what you do with these gifts: what
then happens to you, when they are gone? To the people who cannot believe in
eternity, because your pride will not let you/ I say to you clearly, The
intensities of life are not measurements of the mind/ but truths that will not
be denied. Therefore the intensities of your own life, are the evidence of your
struggle to compete with GOD or your desire to live with GOD. If you
"fight with GOD" then why do you not believe in GOD? How foolish you
are/ as it is true of this very day, your excuses will by you nothing/ your
tears, not even a glance / your begging will merely be too late: you must
choose truth, or you will accept the lie you chose.
A redress of grievances is NOT recognized by the court, they choose failure. Therefore YOU, THE CITIZENS OF AMERICA must decide, if you will face your truths, and live the life you have created in absolute poverty and shame, or by changing become true leaders of this world. IF you refuse these choices, then you will demand revenge and hide in fantasy and worthlessness. Either way your lives are about to change, because all your lies are ending. There are no other choices, for we are too many for any other way/ you cannot run to another place, they, the other nations cannot and will not save you! You are not leaving this planet, or bringing things from there to here.
The purpose of redress is: to have a peaceful, honest, honorable debate under parliamentary order/ that allows the discipline necessary to design and re-design the nation as reality states this must be/ chosen by the people who must live the decisions and do the work. These are NOT political arguments [arguments without VERY serious outcomes]. THIS is the relationship that decides if life shall become extinct on earth. It is not a game/ that is your choice, and this shall NOT be decided by less than the nation itself. Some will laugh and deride this warning as "another end of the world idiot". But truly I do not tell you it is so/ THE EVIDENCE demands this is true. Prove by the evidence, that it is not/ or accept your moment in history and decide.
The meaning of redress in its 1st amendment guarantee is: WE THE PEOPLE shall accept power over you the official we employ, and demand final say, in ANY action we desire. YOU shall not have power over us/ we share. The reality of redress is, the nation is severely threatened and we the people MUST understand, the politician, the police, not the military, or science, or business can or will save you: they created the problem, by not confronting the truth. Therefore redress is our moment in history, to decide what we can do/ if we fail, then we lose; even everything.
The court mocks the nation itself, declares the constitution as useless according to their own whim/ and decides the 1st amendment is MUTE and of no value to anyone. The court has never allowed a redress of grievances/ the court accepts no jurisdiction, because the court is then under the power of the citizen. The intent of the court is thereby criminal, and the words which are used to describe a "good cause" for disputing the rights of the 1st amendment are then a fraud. It is criminal because the court steals my right to due process of law under the 1st amendment/ it chooses to use intimidation, (a long list of useless words) to present a barrier to constitutional guarantee. It uses power and indirect evidence to dispute a right, and conspire against WE THE PEOPLE. Have these rights no value/ they are indeed very precious to all the people who understand them, therefore the court is a thief, and an unrepentant liar.
The first amendment is OUR POSSESSION.
Therefore evidence knows, the degree of the crime comes from the
"top" down/ thereby the
Reality doesn't care about you "humanity"/ you exist not from reality, but from life itself. Truth cannot hear you cry, doesn't care what you think or want, and has no mercy to offer you. This is your truth. Truth is only about order, discipline, and energy. Therefore understand clearly, when you cross the line/ you are DONE, extinction will arrive, and you will have no choice/ because order says it must & energy demand it shall be so. Your critical evidence, and words necessary to confront your existence are identified at www.trialforlife.info And its related links. It doesn't matter what you "think or feel"/ reality says: resources, hate, fear, revenge, and the truth about what 7 billion people in chaos can and will do SHALL DECIDE. Your choice, your only choice is to identify the truth, abandon the lie, and live with honor and honesty. EQUALITY FOR ALL is not just words/ this will be your life, or you will die.
My reality is simply to deliver this message, and live my own life/ I have NO DESIRE to be more for you, than what I currently must provide. This is not fun/ this is not desirable to me. This is necessary: where on earth do you think you or I can hide, from starvation, genetic mutilation, weapons of mass destruction, and all the rest? To those who think "they will prepare and hide", I guarantee, terror will find you/ PREPARE INSTEAD to help the others that all may survive.
Statements short and plain, to begin the
battle and describe the jurisdiction
THE BROAD TOPICS
GOVERNMENT LEGALLY.
4. A case demanding the removal of religion from government/ specifically the religion called evolution. Let the bastard's defend against me.
5. A CASE DEMANDING you shall NOT assassinate the future generations in mass murder, by removing everything they need to survive/ YOU HAVE NO RIGHT! A reality of change. WHERE IS MY GOVERNMENT?
6. A CASE DEMANDING change in the officials of government from "people who vote for me/ to I WILL VOTE FOR MYSELF, on the issues of importance, and these officials shall assure that it is done for me. WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT, and change is required to make this true.
7.a case respecting the truth that the
american dollar is dead. YOU ARE BANKRUPT, but that does not have to mean a
true depression and then war/ it only means expectations WILL CHANGE. Therefore
it accepts the responsibility of discussion to meet and provide these changes
BEFORE the days of mass murder make it impossible. WHERE IS MY GOVERNMENT?
THE REAL TRIAL FOR LIFE BEGINS you can find
it at www.trialforlife.info
The reality of our place in history is, you will NOT be able to hide much longer! When even a few of the consequences you have chosen for yourselves begins to attack you, the american nation/ time will give you only this one brief reprieve from the desperation you will know/ it is this trial. NOT because I say so/ because your reality demands it shall be true. You will decide you direction, I will not. You will decide your commitment to life, I will not. You will choose your fate, by the truth in your words and actions/ for if you begin for justice and life; BUT then turn away, hell shall be MUCH "hotter" because of it. Hell is the truth: defined by: now as you demand/ you shall truly be your own god, and death will not take this away. Why would you choose this? Fully knowing you cannot survive.
I am not here, with this message to bring you tears. Reality says, you have made your own tears/ instead, I am presenting the honesty of your situation, and the reality of your truth: AND THE HOPE that you will live.
The question that presents is simply: why do you not recognize the grave danger you are in? The answer is: because then you could not blame anyone else, and you would be required to admit: you do the things you do, because fear controls your life. It is time to confront these fears/ change what can be changed/ survive if it is possible/ and belong TO GOD if you are wise enough to choose it.
I am here in court for your benefit, NOT for mine. But this time I bring your life or your death with me, the whole nation/ even the world. I TRULY wish it were not so! But truth doesn't lie, and neither do I. You will accept your duty to life, examine your reality, define your truth properly, and choose your destiny
OR
Your own choices will kill you/ because as poor as you are today, a billion more mouths to feed are coming within the next 20 years. You will run out of fertilizers, you are destroying the incubators of the ocean/ changing it forever. You are ruining the earth with callus disregard, and you have chosen weapons of mass destruction as your savior. IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THESE SIMPLE TRUTHS, then you are abandoned as simply "to afraid to live".
To the idiots who say
I am not your enemy/ not your friend either:
merely the messenger. I cannot save you/ I cannot lead you: you must decide
these things individually, and GOD KNOWS How you do choose/ do not pretend, you
will die. If you think I have nothing to say, then read the www.trialforlife.info and show me my
error. IF you cannot, then all you have to refute these words is your own
desire "to be god, rather than life" And you will receive your wish:
as a reality not as your fantasy. There will be no "momentary delusions of
glory/ merely the everyday bludgeoning of life"/ the mutilation everywhere
of death. PRAY THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN, for your whole existence is what GOD HAS
GIVEN TO YOU/ your only participation is what you do with these gifts: what
then happens to you, when they are gone? To the people who cannot believe in
eternity, because your pride will not let you/ I say to you clearly, The
intensities of life are not measurements of the mind/ but truths that will not
be denied. Therefore the intensities of your own life, are the evidence of your
struggle to compete with GOD or your desire to live with GOD. If you
"fight with GOD" then why do you not believe in GOD? How foolish you
are/ as it is true of this very day, your excuses will by you nothing/ your
tears, not even a glance / your begging will merely be too late: you must
choose truth, or you will accept the lie you chose.
A redress of grievances is NOT recognized by the court, they choose failure. Therefore YOU, THE CITIZENS OF AMERICA must decide, if you will face your truths, and live the life you have created in absolute poverty and shame, or by changing become true leaders of this world. IF you refuse these choices, then you will demand revenge and hide in fantasy and worthlessness. Either way your lives are about to change, because all your lies are ending. There are no other choices, for we are too many for any other way/ you cannot run to another place, they, the other nations cannot and will not save you! You are not leaving this planet, or bringing things from there to here.
The purpose of redress is: to have a peaceful, honest, honorable debate under parliamentary order/ that allows the discipline necessary to design and re-design the nation as reality states this must be/ chosen by the people who must live the decisions and do the work. These are NOT political arguments [arguments without VERY serious outcomes]. THIS is the relationship that decides if life shall become extinct on earth. It is not a game/ that is your choice, and this shall NOT be decided by less than the nation itself. Some will laugh and deride this warning as "another end of the world idiot". But truly I do not tell you it is so/ THE EVIDENCE demands this is true. Prove by the evidence, that it is not/ or accept your moment in history and decide.
The meaning of redress in its 1st amendment guarantee is: WE THE PEOPLE shall accept power over you the official we employ, and demand final say, in ANY action we desire. YOU shall not have power over us/ we share. The reality of redress is, the nation is severely threatened and we the people MUST understand, the politician, the police, not the military, or science, or business can or will save you: they created the problem, by not confronting the truth. Therefore redress is our moment in history, to decide what we can do/ if we fail, then we lose; even everything.
The court mocks the nation itself, declares the constitution as useless according to their own whim/ and decides the 1st amendment is MUTE and of no value to anyone. The court has never allowed a redress of grievances/ the court accepts no jurisdiction, because the court is then under the power of the citizen. The intent of the court is thereby criminal, and the words which are used to describe a "good cause" for disputing the rights of the 1st amendment are then a fraud. It is criminal because the court steals my right to due process of law under the 1st amendment/ it chooses to use intimidation, (a long list of useless words) to present a barrier to constitutional guarantee. It uses power and indirect evidence to dispute a right, and conspire against WE THE PEOPLE. Have these rights no value/ they are indeed very precious to all the people who understand them, therefore the court is a thief, and an unrepentant liar.
The first amendment is OUR POSSESSION.
Therefore evidence knows, the degree of the crime comes from the
"top" down/ thereby the
Reality doesn't care about you "humanity"/ you exist not from reality, but from life itself. Truth cannot hear you cry, doesn't care what you think or want, and has no mercy to offer you. This is your truth. Truth is only about order, discipline, and energy. Therefore understand clearly, when you cross the line/ you are DONE, extinction will arrive, and you will have no choice/ because order says it must & energy demand it shall be so. Your critical evidence, and words necessary to confront your existence are identified at www.trialforlife.info And its related links. It doesn't matter what you "think or feel"/ reality says: resources, hate, fear, revenge, and the truth about what 7 billion people in chaos can and will do SHALL DECIDE. Your choice, your only choice is to identify the truth, abandon the lie, and live with honor and honesty. EQUALITY FOR ALL is not just words/ this will be your life, or you will die.
My reality is simply to deliver this message, and live my own life/ I have NO DESIRE to be more for you, than what I currently must provide. This is not fun/ this is not desirable to me. This is necessary: where on earth do you think you or I can hide, from starvation, genetic mutilation, weapons of mass destruction, and all the rest? To those who think "they will prepare and hide", I guarantee, terror will find you/ PREPARE INSTEAD to help the others that all may survive.
Statements short and plain, to begin the
battle and describe the jurisdiction
THE BROAD TOPICS
fourth part
James F. Osterbur
2191 cr 2500 e
Vs
the
the State of
& by default (someone must represent the university, and you are here)
the
office of the university counsel
258 Henry Administration Bldg
Board of Trustees Office
352 Henry Administration Bldg
case #05-2038
filed February 11, 2005 and increased to
include and become this trial for life, by actions of the
PREFACE OR SHORTEN ED
Trial for life
1. As applied by the critical nature of the
legal cause, the purpose and the method of trial is limited to public access,
NOT the tyranny of judicial despotism/ therefore contrary to the documented
realities of exclusive practice as applied by the courtroom: this trial shall be
committed to the nature, the cause, and the view of a jury trial. as asserted
herein, a redress of grievances identified within the 1st amendment
to the Constitution of the
2. OUR national interest in staying alive, in keeping the nation secure from chaos, and recognizing the reality of extinction as presented by the few upon the many/ establishes this case as one of "critical intervention between the murders and us"!
3. The charge layered within is simply: lies are an improper foundation, for any nation/ arrogance does not translate as security/ democracy MEANS "we, count"/ and freedom does not mean, "the American official is in charge of our lives, or may gamble with our deaths/ they may not gamble with our environment/ and must not gamble with our future : BUT MUST ESTABLISH CLEAR & CERTAIN compliance with the American constitution, as written".
4. NO government official has any other power or right than this one: TO DO THE JOB, as described/ NO interpretation applies, the description is clear, the language is certain! Therefore it is illegal and treasonous to gamble and subject the nation to treacherous and insane assumptions of calculated risk wherein the result is the END of THE NATION, THE PEOPLE, OR THE WORLD!
5. YOU the official have NO right beyond the constitution/ you have NO legal position beyond the constitution/ you have NO political powers beyond the constitution/ and you are subjected to the inquisition of critical review, as the constitution allows.
6. This is not a personal lawsuit, [beyond the realities presented] this is not a trial for any arbitration, as a means of solution/ this is a constitutional demand, wherein jurisdiction is applied by the 1st amendment and others, and the court may only do its duty.
7. Constitutional authority is the jurisdiction under which the official or other employee shall have NO CHOICE but to comply. The common constitutional DISGRACE of committing embezzlement of inalienable rights, against the citizen/ by commandeering constitutional guarantees in favor of congressional actions as laws which supercede the foundations upon which they were built, is blatant tyranny.
8. WE THE PEOPLE, exist as the lives lost/ the arms & legs & hopes shattered/ & the relationships which no longer exist. It is NOT political action, which completes or conforms a nation to its decree/ it is military action! NO ONE Gave you anything/ certainly NOT lives or possessions or bodies or their future/ to have YOU conspire and conceive against them. This breech against our authority is TREASONOUS, and clearly accounts in conclusion, in fact: of official disobedience at a minimum.
9. EVERY OFFICIAL is to understand, the basis of the constitution is: a guarantee of inalienable rights/ these are JUSTICE, EQUALITY, FREEDOM, AND OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL. There ARE NO interpretations of the constitutional authority that do not support these realities and truths. ANY ASSERTION of law, or authority beyond this foundation exists literally "as an assassin, whose perversion intents to destroy what others died to give".
10. Constitutional authority applies to any and all cases which demand the attention of the entire nation/ because the nation itself is held under threat, is identified as fundamental to the security of the nation, and which is beyond question ; that the issues presented DO affect us all!
11. There can be NO conveyance of authority to any court or any judge in such matters/ RATHER, the constitution states: neither treason or cowardice shall be allowed: NOT BY ANYONE. The abuse of process, is a treason against the constitution/ and as such may be held to criminal process: your attempt to place me or this action in disrespect, therefore is required to show cause, in word and deed/ your failure to adequately provide this information, should you elect to abort your duty: produces a decree to "execute the constitution itself"/ therefore BEWARE, and hold on tight, to any evidence of collusion as WE THE PEOPLE, may well arise and hold you, personally & legally responsible.
12. It will not be me, I have no use for it: but read the trial and book carefully before you decide "you are immune"/ for I tell you true, nothing could be less true. As all criminals must, you will go to court if the people demand it/ and they will be your judge/ you will not be theirs! IF you think "they have no power/ then look out your window, and count 280 million strong". There are NO excuses for failure to provide judicial procedure to this constitutionally legal exercise: YOU ARE constitutionally bound!
13. On a constitutional level, the assumption of legal parameters NOT suited to a jury trial, such as lengthy & irrelevant issues of punctuation & rules by the court, will not be tolerated. The use of "the simpson trial/ a well documented case of international fame" will provide the necessary legal parameters (if required) of the American court: as it was an international exhibit of American "justice", by the rule of spoiled children/ and serves the public only in the reality of a judiciary "to be mocked & laughed at"/ to initiate change.
14. Even so: this is the maximum you will demand of me, by the levels of "legal parameters, necessary to be met". The DEMAND, is public participation and that comes without the barriers of language uncommon to the people, as is commonly used by the court/ nor do rules whose purpose is simply exclusion, rather than justice apply.
15. As with the rule of newly discovered evidence: the failure to properly define, according to the needs of a jury {the American people} means a betrayal has occurred/ and the lawyer is informed: ethics are the difference between those who are paupers, and those who know what justice means/ if you show no ethics, then you shall have no presence here.
16. The purpose of trial is to educate and instruct, according to the means and fairness doctrine of common disciplines: the illicit use of any policing power, to cause a failure in public comprehension of these matters/ be it for or by rules/ for or by idiotic abrasions of justice for the purpose of power and contempt by authority/ or other, is strictly forbidden. You, as a judicial or other government official will be asked to support these positions, you will be expected to choose JUSTICE, and prosecute failure. You will insure the integration of all aspects of society to incorporate this as their decision, or incur the consequence of malicious malfeasance, whereby the charge of treason shall be applied. Let the people decide.
17. The legal expression of this trial is for the dispersal of evidence, as it confines the integrated reality of decisions made and being made for the present & future, and the consequences of such actions which could be judged TRAGIC. Such decisions controlled by a very few people with such possibility of results as extinction/ mutilation, or genetic instability/ instantaneous destruction or death by the multitude of weapons designed and paid for to kill billions of people/ or the numerous other translations of debt incurred for and against the American people, by the relationship of ignorance, and blind stupidity, to the clear and present danger of guarantees without the slightest security of safety or value. Shall be the primary venue of this trial.
18. The critical truth of applied reality states: the question presented herein is about the life and death of the nation and its people, and the world. The critical presentation of evidence is then NOT about "the end of the world"/ rather this is about fundamental foundations and the expressions of humanity, which can destroy through ignorance/ and which do contain predictable results. These results must now entertain the critical truth of what shall you do/ when this does, if this does, or if it does not happen as predicted, but ends in the tragedy suspected? NO hiding/ NO pretending/ & NO fantasies!
19. The presentation of first evidence is
limited to the critical truth of a world population increasing at approximately
2 million people per week. This reality of demand, shall and is attacking
resources; it is beyond the rate of survival, therefore it will create war/ a
war with weapons of mass destruction, which we as a world cannot survive.
20. The purpose of a courtroom is distinctly: to establish the truth and dispose of [by punishment] the lies, and the liars/ therefore the courtroom is created by the people to fundamentally protect their world: this is your job, as a judge or police or lawyer, or other! The rights of a litigant are not translated by a judge or opposing lawyer/ but by the foundations which grant & do control the expressions of the court: THEREFORE this trial is controlled (as are all legal expressions of trial) by the United States Constitution/ and the appropriate area's of the state of Illinois Constitution; and they shall rule: NOT the opinion of a judge/ but the purpose of the people, as declared, fought for, died for, and sacrificed for.
21. The job of a judge is defined as the "crusader for absolute justice, the defender of honor, & the custodian who keeps the purpose clean/ and understands freedom exists through the patronage of the court, for equality and fair play". You will be held to this standard, or you will defend another; and hold your job and your legal rights as gained by your employment for us, up the scrutiny of justifiable actions, or criminal behavior/ and then "let the people decide."
22. The foundation demand of this first argument: humanity is destined to kill itself/ therefore we must access this matter, gain understanding, and change this outcome!
23. THIS Represents an issue so comprehensible and with such extreme danger, that the interests of the people cannot be denied. The same is true for all demands of this trial document, as it alleges the foundation and security of the nation HAS been relegated to idiots, gamblers, and thieves, but more important than that: the resources upon which life depends are in GRAVE DANGER [how will you live without food or water or hope].
24. Secondary but intertwined are economic
realities, and so much more/ these are the ancillary judgments which describe
realities interwoven with this life, which shall and do also critically
endanger the nation and the people. Ignorance is the blanket reaction described
as prejudice, while stupidity is the clear assertion, that "lies shall not
fail"/
25. The courtroom MUST be used and held to absolute credibility/ because a life or death decision is not a political debate, it is rather the fundamental domain of truth, and the people who will live or die in that truth, and must live within its results. The demand is the BEST that we can do, to understand the truth and establish respect to that truth. The critical resolution of this matter is world cooperation/ therefore the court shall declare: THIS IS NOT OUR JURISDICTION; the government official shall declare "this is an incendiary attempt to scarce and manipulate"; the opposing lawyer shall declare "this is null & void, because the remedy cannot be enacted by the court, as it has no legal force or validity in such matters".
These arguments are prosecuted as mute: under original jurisdiction is found, the power to hear & determine a critical question presented by the affected parties, as the authority of record. The term original applies the comprehension of new & different : such as this trial of life. To the question of WHO is the authority of record/ wherein the lives of every citizen shall be interested, & affected by the outcome? There are "NO supreme people/ NO supreme people who sit as a judge or government official/ NO ONE: that can make a true life or death decision for 280 million people in this nation; or the 6.3 billion people of the world! THEREFORE WE THE PEOPLE, are the authority of record, & WE WILL use the court, to establish our will, and investigate this our need. YOU, the courtroom official/ government official, ARE our employee! Let the people decide.
26. The assertion of fear/ cannot compare to
the reality of being wrong: therefore it has no say! The question of legal
force or validity is mute in the presence of an
27. Destiny explains the path of society simply: equal access, equal opportunity, sustainable structure, critical education, political responsibility, & fundamental appreciation. These disciplined freedoms provide clear & certain & honorable support to all life/ because they implement truth as leader, reality as judge, & life as FRIEND. The simple idiocy of a desire to control is your most blatant enemy/ therefore it is control that must be surrendered, to survive. This is NOT the absence of government/ but the true promise of DEMOCRACY, that ALL the people shall choose "one person/ one vote on the issues themselves/ NOT someone to vote for me, I do it myself. [those things which shall truly change life for us all/ and any other such matter as we will decide] : but within the laws demanding freedom, equality, & true respect for all."
This as relevancy to the court is then applied, in this redress of grievances: as a fundamental partition to declare true democracy has come. Our decisions as the participation of action & reaction/ as truth and the consequences of life: shall then provide our destiny. It is the job of the court, to establish true democracy!
28. The court is being asked to intervene in the planning of mass murder [the murder of a nation and a world]. The court is told to tell the government official being awakened to the cause of critical resource loss and the right of democratic action, that the people expect to hear "you, the official", have only limited choices: that you will act responsibly and with the necessary duty.
29. Relevancy MEANS: a logical relationship/ therefore the facts of what this magnitude of population increase means to the people of America are detailed as: all ecological systems will die due to human impact & greed/ starvation & thirst will occur/ war then begins. The conclusion is therefore: PROVE THIS IS UNTRUE? Because if you can't / disintegration & death for the world [america too] begins: due to the realities involved, twenty years is all that could be left/ this allows the population rise to develop to 8 billion people (and this is only the beginning): a place in history, which cannot be survived.
30. This is the first part of your test, and it does comply with 239 S.E. 2d 811, 820. The foundation of this argument is then as a legal affinity of "Riparian rights": as is DUE to the American people. Whereas no legal necessity has ever been seen as a possibility before, "the water has receded, and this legal land is now open for ownership by, WE THE PEOPLE." The proof of permanent change is allowed by the penalty clause/ described as the graphic nature of failure {it will be tragedy & chaos} to secure the nation, and the world.
31. We as a people, as a world shall change or die. The excuses & innuendo used to hide from these facts/ the subrogation of rights of redress over the nation, to develop as the police power over our government, as the people/ & the plurality of that police power of the people over their own lives & the officials of this government.
32. The remedy sought is therefore CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF every possibility that threatens to destroy, by any method or means whatsoever/ now or in the future: and, the protection of this presence, & that future for the generations to come.
33. The research necessary for any & all matters either declared within or to be added will be conveyed by those who are distinctly familiar with the realities & truth required for understanding [this is NOT a "college degree or expert", but a witness who knows what truth is and what reality means]/ BUT no aspect of evidence will be assessed as absolute & every fact or portrayal of evidence from either side will be scrutinized in detail. The presentation in court shall be limited to understandable doctrine/ suited for public consumption, and agreed upon by both sides prior to release/ whereas the court shall use a web site or other, to provide ALL testimony and ALL evidence in its original state: to whosoever desires it. The public may intervene and ask for clarity of any matter/ they are the jury.
34. The TENTH AMENDMENT of the U.S. Constitution, applies power to the people & limits the scope of all power by federal & state officials to the constitution. That U.S. Constitution, the law & rule of law, & the legal rights of the nation are delivered in the ordained expression at its beginning . Interpretation is at its core: that no judge, no official, & no inferior command or rule or law can defeat these demands of the people who bought this nation with their lives. Therefore the document stands as written and declared, in plain language of the people/ until such time as the people amend it themselves. No political tenure, no judge or courtroom, or official can apply the NINTH AMENDMENT in any other way than to accept the demands of the people, and of this trial and fight for the survival of this nation, and this world. PROVE, this is not so?
35. Justice, and this constitution, demands an inquest, and legal duty asserts: this is a matter for courtroom communication, that all sides & interests be held to truth. And that all evidence be received within the clear & certain penalties of a property alteration or perjury imprisonment or regulation as may be necessary, when properly applied to any liar found. Let the penalty be known/ let the intent be FAIR/ & let LIFE, but not liars, participate as BEST IT CAN.
36. DUE to the "insolvency" and corruption of the court, as described by the case abstract within: WARNING is issued, that negligence and simple corruption is an act of aggression against the people. When duty calls, treason or rape is a conclusion expressed by the fundamental relationship of human to human/ wherein the intent of power serves only the aggressor, and the selfishness of such intent deserves retribution. Therefore the question in fact will be "to prosecute, to garnish, or to simply relieve of that duty" those unfit for honor. The people of the nation shall decide. YOU are not immune, the constitution gives none of this, it says simply: article 3, section 1 quote "the judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior,"/ therefore the lie is removed, and the question introduced: WHO does support justice, equity, and fair play? Failure means removal, if not more. This is NOT a war/ this is a right, and a duty!
37. The
38. Therefore contumacy proceedings will exist for any judge or legal officer, or political officer who violates this "order of the people (let the people choose)". The inherent right of any decision that shall seek to dissuade or order the structured reality of a life or death decision: BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE.
39. The government reports used in evidence; prove the validity of this trial/ PROVE the margin for error for genetic research, weapons of mass destruction, and all the rest; befits the life & death gamble to this nation! That is the demand for beginning this trial and its consequences. PROVE with certainty your failure is not our deaths. In this final analysis, both the court & the government official are reminded: "you are not god"! Therefore no excuse, no statement or power, & no hierarchy of authority can or does exist to remove this decision from the people: ONLY the distinction of treason can be applied, to any who intentionally attempt to prove: they "are the supreme power, over the life or death of the people or nation".
40. This distinction of treason shall be
applied to the decision of: WE THE PEOPLE, and thereby WE THE PEOPLE SHALL
determine the indictment. We the people will reserve judgment for your crimes.
WE THE PEOPLE SHALL demand jurisdiction! BECAUSE WE THE PEOPLE ARE
41. YOU will however bear in mind, this is about the extinction of life on earth. Therefore the world itself watches, and will condemn or praise accordingly. YOU, America are the nation of record: you hold the weapons of mass destruction, more than the others, you started this/ you started the genetic tragedy to be survived/ you are the nation whose consumption of resources is startling/ you say you are the leader of the world: NOW is the time to prove your reality, NOW is the decision that becomes your truth.
42. The examination of basic life interests
and fundamental social values, as well as the expansive evaluation of basic
courtroom realities is the final chapter, and well suited to this forum. It
shall not be denied/ however, if you cannot establish survival/ there is no
further reason to continue. Let the trial decide.
Fourth
part
OSTERBUR, REPLY TO THE COURT
response to: order of the court 2/ 28/05
received by mail, march 2/ 05
order: "Frivolous"
As expected judge Baker's reply to all charges is "frivolous"/ it seems a constant irregardless of the subject matter.
Judge Baker further explains, how "he MUST be taught the law and the constitution/ but if he does not agree, then it does not matter what the merits of any case might be: he will remove reality and institute ignorance.
As predicted, a previous case is used to
suggest "the crux, of the complaint is Osterbur's unhappiness about Carle's
billing practices". By demanding the motion to dismiss, from the
Subject matter jurisdiction by definition is
"the competency of the court to hear & determine a particular category
of cases" these are governed by 28 USC 1330 (Laws of the
Subject matter within the realm of a common citizen is the establishment of a situation wherein common experience demands intervention between those who attack us, those who simply abuse us, or those who use us beyond all measure of justice or right. This trial shows: WE THE PEOPLE, must create the means to decide what is fair, what is justice, & what is a human right, because the court refuses to do its job. This in fact. exceeds the limits of our agreements with each other as a nation to become "a wrong", therefore the court has become mute; betrayed by its own words. It is this subject matter and NOT the corruption of lawyers or the demand of words as law that governs us/ BUT IN FACT the reality of life, that asserts, a courtroom wherein justice may be sought and an honorable existence for all, found: brings these matters and those in the past to court.
This trial is a FIRST AMENDMENT REDRESS OF
GRIEVANCES/ therefore its role in the courtroom is to demonstrate and prove
"tyranny and corruption" exist to rob us of our rights and our
foundation of government, guaranteed under the constitution of
The next step is to isolate the foundation of authority, that decides the fate of this our nation, as "we the people" and then ask them to decide: Is this who we really are, as the court describes, or as the constitution declares? The strength of 280 million people shall decide/ irregardless of "the court, the president, anyone representing our nation/ but ourselves." This trial is about your future, and what it shall be.
The reality of trial as presented 2/11/05 has little to do with Bakers claim of "unhappiness"/ BUT EVERYTHING to do with, the country being bankrupt. Because truth says: we can discuss this as a nation NOW, peacefully and with honesty, OR People WILL begin to react with bloodshed, violence, and the death of a nation is at stake. "Frivolous", by the courts estimation. YOU ARE bankrupt, but that does not mean instant depression, there are methods of resolution available to give you relief and then happiness. Evidence was provided, produced by the federal reserve, and does support this claim of bankruptcy/ therefore Baker LIES and conspires to cover up the truth by another ridiculous assertion of power. Finally Baker asserts he a federal judge, in a federal courtroom, cannot distinguish the words of the 1st amendment (provided in full), that state "redress of grievances": too complicated, I guess. He states that billing & debt and the loss of an entire life's work, are "frivolous matters as well"/ to trivial for the court to intervene in: his job must be to "suck his thumb" I guess. He claims that due process is a game for lawyers only/ because he has NO comprehension of what " duty, respect, or honor does mean: not a clue.
The assumptions of the court are: that trial is over.
THE REALITY, stated to the court is:
Trial begins now, in the consequence of distortion and treason/ treason because life is more important than rules, and power is a futile and stupid endeavor that only harms those who use it. The intent of democracy is not to give power over people to anyone, particularly the employee of court, our purpose in peace. To sell due process and fundamental 1st amendment rights "to protect foolishness and lies", cannot be less than a treason.
Trial by definition is "A judicial examination of issues between parties, whether they are issues of law, or of fact......". The facts are now in place/ and trial soon begins/ a very public trial in the medium of public participation.
As a Democracy, WE THE PEOPLE, Are judge and jury, over every issue brought before the employees of our government: our government is "the words of the Constitution, the bill of rights, and the declaration of independence". No one died for a representative of government/ soldiers die and people sacrifice for the humanity and rights of freedom, not some bastard rule of the court or any other disgrace that intervenes.
As a democracy, this courtroom is discarded/ as is its concept of justice as defecated upon by you. INSTEAD as a citizen, the demonstration of a legal need now begins. And the support of people will be sought. As a reality, this judge SHALL be granted leniency, due to the consequence of this trial/ it is far-reaching and deliberate. YOU the citizen, shall understand neither courtroom, nor judge, nor I can be your savior. The presentation of evidence shall prove this is correct. This nation does now stand at the pinnacle of your ability to submerge the lies/ therefore truth shall now begin to intervene in your lives, and down is the only direction you may go. This trial is distinctly and purposely placed to keep you from "dying in a fall, FROM YOUR DECISIONS". This trial is therefore the opportunity to carefully describe & work for, your own survival and that of the nation and the world. I do not say this to make you afraid/ no joy exists in the words/ no revenge, it is merely a fact. The list of threats to your survival as life on earth is very long/ and easily extreme enough to kill you all a thousand times over. You will do your duty and examine the evidence and let truth decide, and reality determine the avenue/ or you will soon die. Read the documents and decide. This is the ONLY opportunity you get Because there is not time for another.
REMEMBER THIS: we are the people of the nation/ majority does rule, and millions cannot be denied. IF you wish to bring these things to trial in any form or any venue/ NO ONE will be able to stand against you. You may rearrange these documents/ make your own/ reinstate this trial/ use my name to appeal this verdict/ or just use the topics to generate public knowledge and perceptions: it is your choice, the judge merely took the easy way from you/ he cannot remove your right. Choose.
UNLIKE me, "I bring you this message as
my job/ my duty: This trial for you, whether you believe it or not, IS the
difference between your life here on earth or death. LET THE PEOPLE
CHOOSE FOR THEMSELVES.
I do not ask you to believe these words/ I tell you to investigate your reality and defend yourselves from the order you have placed in this life/ that will attack and exterminate you. FOR THE LAST TIME, I will remind you all that
1 a population growth of 2 million more mouths to feed each week/ translates into a world population from 7 billion people to 8 billion people in less than 20 years.
2. The ocean, the ozone, the global warming, the alterations in ocean currents, the destruction of "ocean incubators for life", the pollution of water, the 22 trillion pounds of sea food sold each year (cannot be sustained/ certainly cannot be increased), the rainforest and all other destruction that literally provides the air you breathe, ETC.
3. The genetic destruction, you are literally crucifying life by mutilating it into the extermination of you/ How many times did anything humans do turn into tragedy, "I'm sorry" is useless. The difference is genetic structure is nature, food, life, body, and everything to this life called earth. THE ARROGANCE IS SIMPLY UNBELIEVABLE TO ME.
4. What you don't understand about weapons of mass destruction is simply, used once, and your dead. WHY would you as humanity allow anyone any nation this power over you: The only reason is Simply YOU ARE INSANE.
5. Where will the resources for 8 billion people come from? Is the earth endless? Where is your "Big brains"? If you have no resources/ then you have no work, and you starve besides. IDIOTS!
6. Fusion is not a joke, it is not a fantasy/ you will have people and the possibility to create fusion within 3 short years; maybe less. Fusion is nuclear fire, that is not a guess: it means, literally everything atomic is fuel/ or more simply everything on earth or about the earth is FUEL...... you cannot put it out or control it. The earth will be on fire.
7. YOU are ready to kill each other now, how much more
so/ when starvation becomes a constant reminder every day, terrorists have
assaulted your peace, economies have failed (every taxpayer owes a minimum
$520,000.00 dollars 2 years ago/ you cannot pay it, it shall not continue). And
all the resources disappear: WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE HAPPENS THEN?
If this is insufficient, as it was to the court/ for you to understand life is in grave danger in this very day/ and NOW IS THE TIME to stand up and fight to survive, by encountering truth and working for peaceful change. Then you will die/ clearly you do not have more than 30 years at the extreme. And the earth will die with you.
MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND, but believe there is
only this one chance/ because we are too many for any other way/ and it is too
late, for any other method or hope. THIS IS YOUR CHOICE.
Fifth
part
CASE #
05-2038
DATED 3/25/05
1. IT IS NOW 7 DAYS past the time this
personal letter was sent to Carle Foundation hospital and Carle Clinic
incorporated; one entity pretending, one using the public. The letter found
herein explains greed will not be allowed/ return a letter that says this is
not your intent, or nothing that occurs hereafter will be my fault/ it is
yours. They have not replied/ therefore they choose greed.
2.
TO CARLE CLINIC AND
3.
THE BOARD
4.
YOUR LAWYERS INFORM ME, that you are dissatisfied
with the ruling and wish to bring these matters back to court in full force/ as
there are many true issues to contest.
5.
IT IS NOW TIME TO ASSERT WHERE YOU STAND, as the
defendants in this matter/ and if this is your wish, and your conviction and
your intent to bring these matters back.
6.
I WARN YOU NOW, I will not be so polite this time.
7.
Either restrain and rebuke your lawyers, or it will
not be a legal fight, this time it will be a legal WAR.
8.
IF THE COURT AWARDS THEM ANYTHING, AND YOUR
RESPONSE IN NOT IMMEDIATE AND WITH COURTESY TO ME. THEN IT IS BY YOUR WILL, AND
THERE WILL BE A LEGAL RESPONSE.
9.
CHOOSE.
10. Date
of receipt of the letter from your lawyers is march 15, 2005.
11. If
this is not your doing, then I do expect a reprisal against your lawyers, at
least 3 times the amount they choose to charge me in your name. A return letter
to me, is in your interest/ if this is not your fault.
12. THE RETURN TO COURT:
13. Legal war is literally, either you are a friend or an enemy,
and if you choose enemy then I will not be concerned as to what happens to you.
Some will accuse me of creating this problem and they are only defending
themselves; BUT they are wrong. All matters involved in this trial 05-2038 are
significant in terms of society/ and literally have been expanded by the
14. Since there are enough enemies in this world/ I do offer at any time, the work is for society and for life, and cannot be interpreted otherwise/ the war is over. As to the others involved, Carle demands your participation as well.
15. It has come about that those accused of being greedy, arrogant, & blindly selfish HAVE indeed responded by proving this to be true, beyond any doubt. Through the actions of their lawyers and with Carle's consent, Carle has now contributed their actions to the reality of trial. They have chosen to participate and demanded to be known. In the course of trial 05-2038 Carle's entire response is limited to a waiver of service (they will appear, and so they have). This up to the demand for money, is the entire summary "of their work".
16. As expected the judge FAILS/ proving beyond doubt, as provided in the documents filed, to participate in a courtroom in America, it is fundamentally necessary to immediately present argument, because a pro se litigant is little more than sewer gas to the judge. Employed as a representative of the people, whose job it is to protect society by protecting the individuals in society/ the reality is bought and paid for, the judge adheres to the money/ and worships the power of blatant greed proving, there is NO MATTER in existence that will remove the prejudice of money from the court. Therefore all issues of money must be reserved to the people to decide, and all realities of court involving money MUST be viewed in its entirety by the public through public broadcast and the like. The only method past the courtroom to the public is the removal of a judge.
17. To establish the fundamental boundaries of trial, all defendants are told plainly; let the judge decide before you do any work, that their may be no cause for legal compensation/ when the court fails. They comply because they "have NO defense"/ if they had a defense, they would have used it; all they prove is greed. This trial is national in scope, it is fundamentally WE THE PEOPLE in Composition & circumstance. It has merit because it is critical to the survival of the nation, and that statement is supported with evidence of critical economic collapse and the assertions of civil war, due to the larceny against those who became targets of that greed. This trial IS HONORED BY THE 1ST AMENDMENT of the Constitution, as a redress of grievances: the last resort, when all other methods of survival have failed: and you have truly failed as a nation and a people/ because you fear the end of the world; therefore you have created the participants to kill you, yourselves: how stupid you are. This court being federal in jurisdiction CANNOT REFUSE THE FIRST AMENDMENT, without treason to the people; this is not only your job, because the degree of danger is evident throughout this trial 05-2038 the judge deserts his post and position to hide in lies and innuendo, fully knowing he commits fraud: saying he doesn't understand this is more than a trial about $400.00 dollars. Even a 5 grader would know it is more than about $400.00 therefore he lies. There are no excuses allowed to the court/ the judge knows, the 1st amendment testifies and demands of the court its allegiance and the court fails. Due process is demanded by me, stating not only is this a national problem and national consequence in all aspects of the original filing, it affects my life, and has affected my life and I do deserve the relationship with society that preserves my own dignity. The court says, the matters outlined as constitutional guarantees to the people are merely "frivolous" and deserve nothing. To establish my demand for personal constitutional guarantees, the reality of NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY and the consequences therein is used, in conjunction with a federal reserve document [the United States government accounting/ which cannot be refuted by this judge] as supplemental justification, that time is running out, and we as a nation must act/ therefore the courtroom according to the first amendment must be established. The judge does not dispute the evidence, NO defendant has questioned it/ therefore it stands as correct and without argument, accepted as true/ at this time. Instead the judge excuses himself from the required response, as provided within federal rules of civil procedure 60 for the plaintiff who asks: Is the motion of the US attorney a "mistake/ is it new evidence/ is it a misrepresentation of a participant/ is this motion a fraud/ does this motion have no authority/ or is there ANY reason, that a response is not appropriate by the plaintiff: what is the excuse from the judge as to why should his response [to mute the us attorney] come only after the plaintiff reveals his. The answer is not a mistake/ the answer is fraud: as an employee sworn to uphold the constitution and the law/ the judge subverts control of the law, and asserts control by hostile possession of the law. And for what purpose? The answer is he stands against the law, and submits the false pretense of a matter involving $400.00, instead of national rights. He is a traitor, working for the enemy/ not for the law. His job is simply to bring justice to society and to the people individually; his reality takes the private property of constitutional guarantees and redistributes them to these greedy entities, because without law, society fails. Therefore the judges order is rebuked for BIAS AND DEFICIENCY AND FRAUD, and it is asserted that these are criminal acts against the nation and against me.
18. With malice and disrespect, the judge attacks in his order, opening with lies about a "26 page complaint of single spaced text"/ he offers there is no short and plain statement of the claims asserted; even though the first page of this filing is a short and plain brief depicting federal involvement is required by the court. The judge suggests "similar to another filed by osterbur in 9/7/04 case 04-2196" and decrees "whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action". The review of 04-2196 comes later. The matter of 05-2038 as held in its brief is distinctly a matter for the federal court system/ it is without doubt that the subject matter is understood by the judge. It is upheld under the courts own supervisory role and orders to every judge: "to help the pro se litigant, and provide as much leniency as possible" [or something to that effect]. And it demands that no one shall dispute the subject matter of this trial, by presenting argument immediately and without doubt. The judge discards all argument/ declares no brief exists/ fundamentally discounts every social and national and personal complaint and suggests "that he cannot proceed because ancillary jurisdiction is not a proper one". He states, "the court must have original jurisdiction over at least one of the plaintiffs claims before it can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over other claims forming part of the same case or controversy. 28 USC 1367". Therefore he lies and stipulates that the 1st amendment doesn't actually exist/ he cannot accept it terms therefore he will blatantly and with contempt abandon a redress of grievances by the first amendment as his right to declare "the amendment is a frivolous excuse, that bears no cause, and no right to be heard in a courtroom of law. The law, irregardless of what it says/ is what he interprets it to say. This is theft, of the most basic form of democracy: the right to be equal under law. This judge makes himself superior to the 1st amendment, therefore superior to the law/ and a consequent thief. Let him, or the court for him, submit the truth and confront my right to proceed under the 1st amendment/ or let the court remove all barriers to this action. If not the court is in contempt/ and each member who refuses or could have acted DOES deserve to be jailed, for that contempt.
19. This judge argues "as with his last complaint osterbur does not bring his claim pursuant 28 USC 1331 as (claims originating under the constitution...). The judge lies fully aware and knowing that a pro se litigant is not under the very same restrictions as a "member of the bar"/ therefore he corrupts the action, prepared to submit that because the title 28 USC 1331 does not appear in the brief or the arguments of the original filing/ NO opportunity for the court to "see the law" exists. The clear intent is theft, the judge steals my right and the rights of all citizens to a fair hearing for justice/ and rules for fraud: the intent to appear as judicial, when in fact the corruption is so blatant even a "citizen of the United States of America" can see it. This judge claims this case 05-2038 is not a matter in controversy exceeding $75,000.00 (the current expectation provided by amendment 7 of the constitution, that GUARANTEES me my day in court, by jury trial). This is without support, and guarantees this judge is prejudiced against not only me/ but as these documents stand for: the preservation of the nation, and the honor of society: this is treachery, and amounts to treason: as I am sold for financial slaughter, to greedy men and women/ and the nation to grief and desperation, because these matters are important to us all. HOW could this be considered otherwise, particularly considering the two separate trials judge baker ruled upon, in the past; ridicule cannot be trusted.
20. The judge issues conclusory statements to prescribe
tyranny [does he own my mind/ these are not my words or my work] and rearrange
my filings to suit his ends. This is deceit and the declarations of perjury
[does he not stand in a courtroom and proclaim lies]? He does indeed. The judge
abandons his duty, and says "its an
21. Baker asserts in effect, limited jurisdiction as his reason & right to dismiss. Baker asserts, OUR federal courtroom wherein he resides as an employee , lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter even though he is fully aware of constitutional guarantees/ he states "frivolous". Therefore let the record reveal what he calls frivolous:
22. the first amendment guarantees, "a redress of grievances" THIS IS NOT a joke or a misprint or a failure to understand/ this is a reality that exists for use by the individuals of society/ a primary foundation of this democracy, as important as the rest of that very same amendment. Let the record show, at no time does this judge claim any portion or part of the filings are incorrect or inappropriate to the cause of justice; as is usual, "being only an American Citizen/ I have no rights in this courtroom of this government: PAY THE MONEY, and let the extortion begin by surrendering my right, my constitutional guarantees to a lawyer to speak for me: I REFUSE, for I am adequate to defend myself. Even so, I plainly request of this judge to provide "lawyers for the public aspects of this trial/ and do state, I am not a lawyer and cannot defend the others". As with all other aspects of merit to this case 05-2038 the judge allows prejudice to overrule justice. The original filings alone are sufficient to demand jurisdiction is fully defined and correct within this courtroom. The subject matter or anti-trust issues, the deficit and its issues of greed and the corruption of power, or now under color of law the judge who deprives me of civil rights by using prejudice to control my appearance in a courtroom of law, and breach of warranty [that by the constitution I may have my day in court] is simply denied by conjecture and not accepted in the social context with which it is written. Prove this trial is simply about me. Baker provides NO DIRECT ASSERTION OF AUTHORITY against any portion or part of the pleadings themselves/ preferring to attack the litigant, because I am an easy target, and the pleadings are not. Instead of "innocent until proven guilty" which means: until you have proven the pleadings are wrong by content and not innuendo and frivolous rules/ THEY STAND COMPLETE and without contest in this courtroom of law, the law cannot touch them until it proves they are wrong. Again you are not as a judge or officer of the court/ capable of judging me, only the law can do that/ and only those laws that obey the constitution are allowed power over the citizen in this democracy. The rest are a compromise/ and my citizenship is not to be compromised: you have no right.
23. In the original filings section starting with paragraph 1 seeks to establish medical malpractice by their methods of billing/ which then result in the concepts of fraud & conspiracy. The result is an extortion in reality due to the consequences of a medical emergency, and the subsequent billing without critical and real opportunity to contest. The reality of greed and tyranny is transferred to "these private enterprises" due to the massive power established, for the benefit of the medical enterprises which has then become a tremendous financial burden to all who then enter their doors/ because under current law; clearly we have no rights, and no opportunity to contest, even when the evidence is clear and certain: they hold all the power. That means in the reality of this society, any medical trauma becomes nothing less than an unreasonable search and seizure of the financial and personal securities of that individual in medical trauma/ and the result of this blatant enslavement by financial means/ amendment 4 is examined within its intent: "That the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue....". The question for constitutional construction is then, does this not apply to unwarranted power over an individual/ and should there not be a platform in equality for both sides to adequately resolve any financial issue as may present itself. This is of national concern.
24. In the original filings section starting with
paragraph 7 the charge is "the court is a place of ill-repute, a place of
deception, bias, and criminal acts against the people/ which fills only the
pockets of lawyers and the greed of medicine. It continues with the charge of
collusion in these things and is a disgrace, for its role over the people , and
the reality of very little justice/ due to language and innuendo that the
people afflicted with trial cannot understand: unlike the courts saying
"ignorance of the law is not excuse/ ignorance of the charge against you
is not tolerated either: check your miranda rights & rulings and see. The
court and its officers are charged with making sure the defendant or plaintiff
understands in this matter, it is not up to the lawyer/ it is incumbent upon
the court: are we less than criminals/ does not the loss of a lifetime worth of
work, the end of financial stability, or retirement or any other present true
consequences? Greed is a disease that has spread throughout all of medicine/ a
reality that has cost very many people their lives, their teeth, their family,
their property, and has made them slaves [because they could not afford to go/
these thieves would steal everything]. So life or limb is held in the extortion
of sign your financial future away, or go ahead and die. Some will argue, too
poor, you won't pay. But reality says "you got anything/ going to get
anything/ can you steal anything; sell your body whatever" they will come
to take it away, and demand more. The essence of this complaint is not
"free medicine"/ rather it is a relationship within the 5th
amendment that holds "no person shall be.....twice put in jeopardy of life
or limb; ....nor be deprived of life liberty, or property without due process
of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just
compensation." There are know incidents wherein the medical industry preys
upon people without insurance. As is in clear evidence in this trial 05-2038
the right to trial is a joke, an outrage, and more simply a "cease and
desist order" from all sides involved in the commission of a crime: to
hold the citizen expecting justice/ to the anvil wherein a lawyer may without
cause "smash his or her head in while stripping them of all property,
dignity, or whatever the judge is coerced to allow. Where is your honor/ you as
a court produce only shame on
25. The section starting with 15 describes the "bundling practices" of Carle and its subsidiaries, and asserts consumer protection is necessary and specifically asks of the court to examine the reality of surgery in particular, and all medicine as a reality as the literal invasion of that person. Therefore at a minimum we DESERVE the information necessary to expect a probable cause or outcome, through knowledge/ rather than excuses. The ridicule of the medical industry as it is allowed to "search and seize" our bodies/ and yet we have NO access to even basic information of these people is a DISGRACE. Again the 4th amendment guarantees a right to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures...." the invasion of your own personal body cannot be of greater concern than anything else the 4th amendment applies to. It is an UNREASONABLE search and seizure, that we are restrained from information, and held in contempt by the court as it refuses the basic necessities of dignity and right. The 4th amendment declares "the right to be secure shall not be violated....and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized". While the court will argue, this is an interpretation/ I tell you true, that as these things apply particularly to medical traumas, the intent of protection of the people is inherent in all matters of the constitution and we are just as valuable as those charged with criminal intent.
26. Section 21 demands court reform, to establish a courtroom for the people/ NOT A COURTROOM for the judge, the lawyer, the police, or the money that corrupts the process. A place wherein a citizen shall find JUSTICE, and not the arrogant bleeding of pride, and the pitiful portrayal of power and greed; is it not power that demands control, instead of justice/ is it not greed that is more concerned with "keeping the status quo" instead of preparing and preserving society and the nation/ is it not pride that thinks only of revenge in the form of an attack for money: IT IS without doubt. You should all be ashamed.
27. Section 26; assembles the monopoly game, wherein price fixing is always in evidence/ there is no other reason for the monopoly game/ therefore it is inherent and obvious. Bankruptcy for the nation, the result of decades of greed in collusion with the politics and court, have destroyed the life's work of at least 50 million people: are you proud? Amendment 7 demands all cases beyond a specific minimum limit, SHALL BE HEARD IN COURT, BY JURY TRIAL/ the constitution gives NO EXCEPTION. Therefore you have no right to take away this trial/ the constitution itself; "Your boss and mine as a citizen" have made that perfectly clear/ and your portrayal in defiance of this mandate of your position as judge clearly charges you with FELONY ASSAULT. This is a criminal act, and there is no ignorance of the law. This is primary to your oath, and you have no excuse/ no exceptions.
28. Section 31 WE THE PEOPLE IS our only alternative to bankruptcy and the civil war it will produce. This is the reason the 1st amendment provides "redress of grievances" for the people/ and the constitution further verifies this demand by the words of amendment 9 and 10. Simply, it is not the constitution itself that verifies the right to trial, but the cause/ and this cause is the life or death of the nation itself. It is not enough that you may say, prove "the nation will die"/ for that is done beyond conceivable evidence only when the nation is in fact dead. Therefore prove the evidence and pleadings are not adequate to achieve a level of concern worthy of investigation/ and then questions will be answered. Until you prove otherwise, the sanctity of this demand within the 1st amendment rights of a citizen of WE THE PEOPLE shall stand.
29. Section 35 exists as the charge of larceny,
corruption, and the failure of the medical industry to adequately police
itself/ that charges the
30. Section 41 is the assertion of a public discussion and an honorable contract wherein equality and truth rules all. Therefore national problems and national reason exist for a class action suit
31. Section 46 is simply duty demands of every citizen the consequence of life/ therefore these things are not political, instead they are life, death, and the relationship we all share with each other. Politics are merely the excuses & compromise of a society to lazy to defend itself.
32. Section 50 completes the fundamental disrespect that
contempt and fraud by the courtrooms of
33. Section 51 of the original filing is a warning of a third trial
34. Section 52 repeats Redress of grievances is a 1st amendment guaranteed right/ and there is sufficient subject matter and jurisdiction is absolutely clear throughout all aspect of these filings. Your perjury is mute. The right of due process means literally: whether I am a lawyer or not/ I DO DESERVE MY DAY IN COURT, and the mandate to the court by the nation is as it has always been, this judge and every judge SHALL do what you can as our employee, to make this happen, and bring justice to the nation. NOT PLAY in the pit of snakes, where arrogance believes "a friend to me"/ they are not.
35. The use of courtroom rules and innuendo without merit has long and in many forms been used to destroy due process and constitutional right, as a tool for default and corruption of a judge. I tell you true, in a democracy of WE THE PEOPLE We have an equal standing/ you are not greater than me, nor am I to you: instead guaranteed rights and fundamental justice determine the truth. And the truth is, you preach nothing but hate.
36. As to the
ignorance and contempt of the court, by the
37. As to the arrogance, selfishness, greed, and revenge filed by Carle on march 14, 05. These lawyers do not even suggest they have worked, instead they use the judge/ and believe they are protected by its order/ therefore now they can attack. This is after the fact/ as they did not participate prior to this moment. NOW having chosen to participate and demanding an audience/ they have purposely chosen to enter trial and examine their responsibilities; this is their choice, not mine. For if I have responsibilities/ then so do they; is that not the purpose of the court to produce equity before all members and all participants. What is justice if all sides are not equal before the court? It is a fraud.
38. Their lawyer states to the court #1 "Confusing, assuming it is directed to this courts order feb 28" My response entitled and emboldened Osterbur reply, to the court, response to order of the court 2/28/05 fundamentally charges contempt, frivolous and totally without merit: as the lawyer for the defense is not allowed to think for me or direct my words according to his desire. Therefore my response so entitled allows for no doubt, and the lawyer ridicules. Is this a function of the courthouse rules to allow ridicule of the plaintiff? Perhaps so, for lawyers commonly use statements and innuendo in a courtroom which in any other setting would be defamatory or liable.
39. Federal rule 60 is not sustained, because contrary to
the fundamental exercise of authority, the first rule that applies in this
trial is the request for legal aid to be provided by the court, due to the national
interests involved. Rule 60 is thereby moot to the lawyers charge, because the
judge and his order are in violation of the first rule of any courtroom: the
law decides/ not the judge, not the rules/ but the law. The law that governs
all these decisions is based upon the constitution of
40. The fundamental purposes of this trial are clear/ neither the court or the lawyers on any side, are illiterate, and none seeks to contest with the foundations presented, all hide.
41. #2 of the lawyers response states conclusory or imaginary statements of alleged misconduct which might....without support or merit and simply stated for inflammatory purposes and can thus be disregarded. In response, returning to the order in review of judge baker, he a federal court judge can find NO jurisdiction over any single charge filed, not one: HE LIES. Leaving me with two choices, either continue knowing without doubt; even if the filing were "perfect under the rules of the court/ it is without doubt, the end is pre-determined, a matter of prejudice and evidence. Or as chosen to expand the case into an expression that the common citizen can recognize as a failure of the court. I chose the latter, and this is the courts decision not mine. It is the courts failure, not mine. To quantify that statement the dictionary meaning of subject matter is quote: the thing in dispute, the nature of the cause of action; the real issue of fact or law presented for trial as between those parties, & the object of a contract. The judge and you understand the subject matter perfectly, even if it is beyond the norm.
42. The judge claims he has no cause for original jurisdiction over any matter represented in the filing or in the reply: original jurisdiction is the jurisdiction of the court to hear a matter in the first instance. As applied under article 3 section 2 cl 1 "the judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity arising under this constitution.... " the 7 examples provided in the osterbur reply GRANT THE 1ST AMENDMENT REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES unless the court can prove otherwise. The court is mute/ therefore the 1st amendment stands! Did I not provide this is a redress of grievances according to the 1st amendment? I DID indeed.
43. The judge argues, that in "26 pages" of the
original filing, there is NO controversy that exceeds $75,000.00 in dispute.
The judge lies, and in so doing defiles the court of the
44. Baker asserts a conclusory, improper, and inflammatory statement; "Can he read my mind". He provides no support for his statements and no merit can be found to support his statement/ it is rebuked.
45. Baker asserts a filing dedicated to national interests
is for the "
46. Baker concludes he finds NO cause and NO understanding of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 7th, or 14th amendments. Baker continues to assert this is strictly a personal billing dispute/ even though a grade school level education knows it is not. Baker suggests that NO problem exists in Carles billing practices, and that I have no right to be informed, expect a fair & reasonable billing, or that it is unfair that I must defend myself as does every patient against an army of litigators. Baker demands financial repercussions are not real, and do not critically wound the lives of millions of people every year/ turn this case into a class action suit and we will see. Take a look, and explain to me exactly where the justice in these things is located, prove that justice occurred; is this too much to ask?. Baker says "I am clearly insufficient in my complaint" . I DISAGREE, for any jury in the land would understand "better than baker" therefore his position is deserted/ and his order rebuked.
47. #2b the reply to the court states beyond doubt in 7 short & plain & clear descriptions (page 4) exactly why a redress of grievances is necessary and there is NO MORE CLEAR usage of language in any text or in any law book, that can refute its subject matter is clearly within the 1st amendment and the protection of the nation. This is a matter about life or death of the nation. This is a matter that asserts; you cannot disprove without investigation any single description, certainly not 7/ therefore DO YOUR DUTY and protect the nation.
48. #2c The bankruptcy & greed of the medical industry describes a situation that has deteriorated even to the possibility of the death of the nation itself [prove when 50 million people learn, they have nothing/ that consequences are not imminent] prove that a redress of grievances is not the most and only tool available along with WE THE PEOPLE, to stop this destruction. Greed is the tool used to create this trouble, prove the medical industry is not greedy and at the forefront of this failure and fraud. It does belong.
49. #3 The failures of a judge does not produce sufficient subject matter for the failure of a court. Your rule here is irrelevant. You are now the participant who lacks subject matter, as you have failed to assert why I should owe you anything. Your assertion of "not for profit" Has been heard and will now be contested in the future. Everything you filed is about the decay of value and subsequent imaginary statements that protect no one/ in reality not even yourselves. I filed for honor, duty, and the life of a nation: WHERE is your honor?
50. The need fo court, remains the only motive involved in my demand for trial 05-2038. I HAVE PROVEN SUBSTANTIAL NEED AND RIGHT. Therefore the court, the judge, & the reality of trial have been expanded "beyond the norm" for this type of pleading/ because NOTHING LESS will do.
51. As to bakers
final words, he appears to become petty, refusing to allow electronic filing.
In reality it is a trick he learned from the bastard's of the 7th
federal appeals court in
52. This is a case about christmas ornaments on village property/ and neither case had anything to do with religion, christmas, or village properties or anything of the kind. A clear and simple perjury in collusion with each other/ they conspired to commit fraud/ and steal my rights as a citizen and did so: it is a felony; Because my rights are worth something more than money.
53. To cover their tracks, these frauds issued a expunge from the court order to remove the evidence. But I still have my copy. Baker no doubt intended to do the same/ by remaining in paper he could use the concept of "Trash reduction"/ whereas electronic filing would be much harder to submit, without attention directed at that action.
54. Again this review is NOT MY expectation or design. I intended to use the information gathered for BETTER PURPOSES/ but arrogance and pride insisted. Therefore we begin again/ the order of the court is removed by cause of fraud rule 60> 3 and by failure and criminal intent rule 60> 6 and more.
55. Your interests are no longer important to me, whether you gain or lose irrelevant to me/ let the war begin: with this one exception.
56. There are enough enemies in this world, choose to help me protect the nation and support the honor of society and democracy, and we will "be friendly".
57. So there can be no doubt/ this redress is not about me, the reality is an invitation to all who can and will speak across the nation, they present the nation decides. But I would participate. These issues are the intent of this trial, not me. You cannot say you don't understand, because even a child would/ a jury without doubt, therefore you have no defense/ unless you can prove the 7 categories within the reply are in error. And you must prove substantially that these things do not truly endanger the nation and the world, otherwise they shall stand/ even if you desert.
58. as of today, an order arrives from judge baker, striking the “osterbur reply” as immaterial. And not in response to the courts 2/28/05 order/ further 4/6/05 at 9:30 in courtroom B at federal court in Urbana is set for hearings to address the issue raised by Carle demanding money. Dated 3/ 23/ 05
59. jurisdiction of this judge is then contested in this matter to be held as a motion trial 4/6/05. Evidence has been provided as to the legitimacy of his claim to be impartial or doing his duty. He has effectively selected a tiny matter from the original filing, moved to denounce and disclaim justifiable and harmless under rule 61 of federal rules, as nothing used by the judge can be held as consistent with “substantial justice”. And again “the court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.
60. I have instead held to the five required elements of a lawsuit: it is a wrong to be held without equity or rights to a contractual debt, without full disclosure prior to making a decision in that debt. I have produced 7 distinct injuries and wrongs against the nation and me, which the judge discounts, because he refused to do his duty and protect the nation. I have submitted that the medical greed is in fact a situation that has been addressed, and he has “shit on it” because he is prejudiced to the aspects of fundamental justice and the truth of trial: that justice is not, “held up by conspirators or corruptions that in effect are common criminal activities: a simple thief, hiding in the dark in the alley”. I have demonstrated with truth and evidence that this nation is bankrupt producing irrefutable evidence in the form of the federal reserve, and demanding action lest the reality that comes from this deception and fraud/ devours the nation itself/ the judge vomits on this, and runs scared into the alley for more destructive actions.
61. jurisdiction has been established, the subject matter
is known and explained in detail/ whether you like it or not. Federal courts
enforce “federal law”
or more correctly the
62. In more clear detail the preamble of the constitution which describes the state of our union, and the responsibilities of all citizens including judges: states WE the people, in order to form a more perfect union {a duty to challenge, where life is inadequate to defend itself; such as medical billing} establish justice { wherein a pro se plaintiff must act whether “legally schooled or not”/ because fools are using rules and various other deliberate tools to disavow and discredit true justice and fundamental EQUITY (Equity means I am equal with this judge/ not under or over, the law decides not the rules: the law is the constitution, and the amendments used and the filings clearly prove a right) {these filings are about justice, take a look, not one word from the judge about anything relating to justice because he has no defense/ arguments stating rules or laws inferior to protecting society or personal rights to contest are an infringement of rights/ not a protection of them; I do not ask for anything less than the protection of society/ I have received only the disgrace of misfeasance, and the mistrial of a judge prejudiced against me from the beginning; due to past matters which he could not legally dismiss then either; a fact that caused the appellate court judges to conspire and commit perjury and felony larceny [lies which robbed me of due process].
63. the preamble of the constitution further states that it is the job of the government and the people to “insure domestic tranquility” {the protection of the peace, by demanding bankruptcy and national depression be mediated, cannot be understated/ the judge finds this frivolous}. “providing for the common defense” means literally the court shall “bend over backwards to provide access to the court system/ making certain every person, receives an adequate trial for the purposes of justice {this court plays with the amendments/ supports organized crime by disrupting the proceedings to spread contempt throughout the nation and certainly to everyone who seeks justice {this too is a crime, punishable by the removal from the bench/ if a jury would understand, a judge must as well/ NO EXCUSES.}
64. the preamble of the constitution ends with
“secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our
posterity” {a right to
trial, did you provide lawyers as requested? No you did not, therefore you are required to give me
access to court by demand of the fourteenth amendment section 1, try reading
it.} if you do not produce an
honorable and honest cause/ why the
filings are not important to the people and to the nation, or to me
personally/ then I DO HAVE A
GUARANTEED RIGHT, to justice, and not less than respect. This judge has no
respect, and uses his seat as a weapon, not for civil actions or civil rights
but contempt for all the people of
65. the demand is quit sending men and women to their deaths in other countries, and for once in your lives stand up for the democracy that we are. In other words, produce JUSTICE, do not talk, do not complain, do not run and hide/ DO YOUR DUTY, AND DEFEND LIFE.
66. There are no limitations in the first amendment/
therefore I a citizen of the
67. There is no immunity/ because the judge is not performing his duties as directed by law/ he is hiding in rules to disgrace the law, and prove all that is wrong with the court today.
68. There is no conscience in this court; for this judge shows no standard of decency or fairness. Rather bigotry uses the rules and the lies of this court to escape from duty and design revenge and failure.
69. THE FACTS AND EVIDENCE of true concern to the nation are in plain view, the reality of mischief in the court and outright disgrace is also in plain view. The foundation of critical merit is based not in rules BUT IN REALITY, as it is supported by TRUTH ITSELF. You can see it, and you do know this is true and real and legitimate for its proclaimed intent: to protect the nation, and resolve issues that are both troubling, damaging, and blatantly wrong.
70. IF I MUST do more than has been provided/ then you merely play with the lives of us all, for you do know the judge uses me for a victim/ I have plainly told you the appellate judges in this district are unrepentant liars, and provided evidence in the record baker has been picking apart without cause and expulsing. And you are all conspirators and by that measure, if you know and can react better/ then you desert the law, the democracy, and justice for us all: “it is the definition of a traitor”: WHO THEN ARE YOU?
71. by rights, I do claim protection from all actions against me under the federal whistle blowers act: are these things less than money? While this act may or may not be specific to this case/ the reality of justice knows, that actions used by a judge to dispense tyranny is against the constitution itself Article 3 section one states “shall hold their offices during good behavior” does this not mean where bad behaviors are clearly in evidence/ there shall be penalties. Is the travesty and wrongdoing of a judge less than a corporate official? I tell you it is the very same/ or more correctly worse, because society is dependent upon the court? And they fail, just as worldcom, enron or any other. I find myself a whistle blower at this moment/ due to unconstitutional activities in the courtrooms of America: YOU MUST prove it is the intent of democracy and justice to remove the pro se litigant from the courtroom and deny due process and its appropriate justice/ to surrender the courtroom to the greed of lawyers and judges: who else can enter court: YOU HAVE PROVEN, no justice exists for the citizen of America in this court, and HOW MANY others. No need to clutter the reality with nonsense regarding law and rules/ it is clear and certain, baker will move to expel this portion of the record as well. And I do know by the evidence already in force within this trial 05-2038 that an absolute perfect document would be insulted in the same way if it came from my hand/ to this judge.
72. I HAVE presented pleadings under health laws, and you know it/ I HAVE presented pleadings under anti-trust laws, and you know it/ I HAVE presented pleadings under civil right and guaranteed by the constitution laws, and you know it/ I HAVE presented pleadings under contract laws, and you know it/ I HAVE presented pleadings culpable by the court whose job it is to guarantee dispute resolution, only to have the court conspire to falsify testimony and the judge pleads “too stupid to understand”/ rules are NOT your “get out of jail card”, to reduce honesty to larceny. The code of conduct for justice is “JUSTICE FIRST”!
73. In closing, the demonstration of facts herein and hereby through this trial 05-2038 submits THE UNITED STATES COURT SYSTEM IN AMERICA is in disarray and presents evidence in direct disrepute of all the democracy stands for: fundamentally meaning, if no american citizen can participate in an honest courtroom hearing wherein any seated jury from society itself would fully understand the evidence and the purpose as for justice/ then the judge who denounces justice, discounts claims to the preference of rules, and destroys the liberty of a practicing democracy of WE THE PEOPLE, is fully in rebellion against the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
74. the above document is sent to “MANY PLACES” of both media
and the court system of
75. liberty herein means; the right to participate in truth,
for the betterment of society. This court, this judge, and previous courts have
proven beyond doubt, that
truth is not a participant in the courtroom of
76. I did provide substantial cause for trial and hearing/ I did say to the court, I am not a lawyer, send one because this affects all the people: a medical industry against society, through the use of greed. I did provide evidence, and supported that evidence with facts. The hearsay of the judge in demanding useless little rules, is both frivolous and demonstrates true discrimination. Is this justice/ NO IT IS NOT.
77. I did not come saying “I am right, listen to me”/ INSTEAD I came saying these things are serious affecting all of society and we need to investigate and decide what can be done before very bad things occur. It is hypocrisy to assert, that a federal court is not for this purpose, all laws go to this very purpose/ but politics are distinctly the problem, and evidence in the form of a national debt which proves bankruptcy MEANS it is no longer a political problem, redress is the only solution. It is this reality that DOES demand a national redress of grievances within the 1st amendment. Therefore this trial is about “the very employees of government that are hired to protect us/ and did not”.
78. the consequence of these realities is now the
subjection of all participants to the original truths explained in the filings
of this case 05-2038. The
purpose of the state of Illinois being a defendant now comes to fruition: I a citizen of ILLINOIS, a state of the
United States of America, whose very position is intended to support the
citizen against inappropriate advances of the federal government is asked: where is my protection/ it is not
in the constitution if those individual employees refuse to honor it/ such as
this judge. I am one/ the state of IL is many, BUT THE JUDGE is only one as
well. The power of democracy is in its constitution, NOT in its employees;
therefore I do assert, that your position here is to defend the constitution
both of the
79. the consequence of these realities now goes to the
defense of all positions: Carle
states “we are not-for-profit” apparently under all their various
names. The question to the state of
80. in the consequence of these realities, the position
of the
81. as we return to trial/ either in the courtroom or in the media view / some will suggest “ I attacked the judge from the outset, setting him up for failure”. It is not true, he accepted the case from another/ knowing it was me; should he not be considered forewarned. In preparation for this trial, a previous trial as listed in the documents was initiated. The purpose of that trial was to ascertain whether anything had changed since the last time in court “perhaps justice or a resemblance to respect had been born”? clearly it was not so, and I asked in methods of the court and in personal “have you changed” questions before the court. Therefore from the beginning, it WAS NECESSARY to approach the court as a hostile witness/ because that is exactly what would and did come.
82. I am not a lawyer, therefore the options are limited to me/ and the claimed immunities so broad “a terrorist can harbor in them” or a judge. This anticipatory breach because of evidence in the past IS CLEARLY a result of past experience with this judge/ who when he discovered he could not participate as a judge, should have reclused himself from the proceedings: he did not, a question he needs to answer.
83. it is certain the US attorney expects protection from all counts by the court, even though due to the nature of the filings it is clear and certain these two have sought desertion from their duties/ and with reckless disregard portrayed the American people as abandoned. It should not be so!
84. this document “call it anything you like, because nothing in your rules will change it”/ it is my statement and my presence in the court for the april 6, 05 at 9:30. It is sent earlier that you may decide what you intend to do, before you act upon it: but it may not be thrown out under any circumstance prior to court on 4/6/05 as it does stand there as my presence in court before the judge. We both know, my presence is irrelevant to the outcome of this motion trial/ and this document is my words, my defense, and my right to stand before the court. IT IS A FACT, that any written document can be used against me, in a wide range of legal realities/ therefore it is a legal presence, and it is my statement to you: that no matter what is said, this is my only response to this motion trial.
85. I will however remind you clearly, having removed all other filings and dumped them in the trash/ if you throw this document out/ then you have no excuse to do less than throw out all motions against me: EVERY ONE. If you do not, then you have acted without evidence or fact/ and have threatened my life without cause. Is this not a criminal intent?
86. THE ISSUE of revenge, is clear in this motion trial/ therefore I refuse to be present so that an “imaginary frown” or he didn’t like the way I was dressed cannot be confused with an opportunity to raise the issue of contempt. I have no opportunity to defend myself in this courtroom/ against such hypocrisy, therefore I will not present the opportunity/ and you have no right to command my presence.
87. we now come to the “moment of truth” as it regards this proceeding: it is time as a nation to choose sides, whether you vote with your life and your standing in community to be “ a citizen with guaranteed rights in a court of law/ or not”. The fact that the content of trial is not to your liking is irrelevant, truth doesn’t care what you like. Truth is the difference, that decides the future.
88. as has been plainly described in all these documents,
unless the 3 judges who chose perjury and lies in the 7th circuit of
the federal appeals court in
89. therefore an ultimatum is given to the district court/ find a new judge that we may proceed herein: OR MOVE this trail to the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. Because it does involve the entire nation, our future, our lives, and our past: in NO uncertain terms.