IN THE CHAMPAIGN COUNTY COURTROOM
FOR THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
URBANA IL, 101 E. MAIN ST.  61801

DATED 11/14/ 11
CASE 10-MR-906

JAMES F. OSTERBUR

VERSUS

STATE OF ILLINOIS;   ET AL.

 

PRELIMINARY FILING, establishing the ground rules for hearing November 23, 2011 courtroom E;   11:00 am

The foundation of this case, which is the fifth amendment law, of the state of IL; as expressed by the IL constitution.  Which does govern all actions, rights, and responsibilities of both the citizens of this state, and the employees of this state with regard to what they must/ or must not do, by the contract of our democracy.  That, Has already been tested, and found to be: that the employees of the courtroom/ the politicians/ and lawyers for those employees; INTENDED TO BE,  for the citizens of this state of IL.   Absolutely refuse to obey the laws, provided within that constitution/ or for these citizens.  That said due to prior litigation which does prove this reality is true.  We remove the excuses simply:   Avoidance is not compliance/ refusal is not obedience/ arrogance and ridicule is not honoring the law, the people, or their sacrifices and trust; and so on.

That said: because these lawsuits are evidence to the people themselves.   It is fundamentally necessary to establish, not only the definition of redress, as has been done sufficiently.  But the cause and consequence of redress: as it has been refused in the courtrooms of this state and this nation.  So that the people themselves can understand, what is refused/ what rebellion does prove/ and what arrogance is doing to their world, their future, and their right to survive..  Therein we look to the evidence of trial, to assess what it is or is not established.  That this litigant feels the public DOES HAVE A RIGHT to intercede in, as citizens in a democracy which guarantees them the law, and the right:   to govern themselves.

 

We begin with the current case of 10 mr 906


It starts simply enough: a grain elevator expands so significantly, that the barrier between a community business and a corporation overrunning the community exists.  Therein noise, and other problems are multiplied as well.  The court is asked as the protector of community, the people, and their justice or rights:   to please make the employees we pay to insure standards are kept, as agencies both state and federal BE responsible to our lives, and investigate this reality.  More specifically standards are in place for volume and longevity of noise, that state:   over this limit, people will be damaged in their hearing, consequently their lives.  I add, having been damaged in hearing already, I know that the levels and frequencies being used are believed by me:   too high/ and the consequences are severe.  NOT A SMALL MATTER, life changing!  That is only one issue presented.  But more correctly this presentation to the court is to gather the necessary legal evidence, which makes a courtroom possible: should the people of this community decide that they must protect themselves along with me.  The state court complains/ the federal court takes over.  The legal battle turns to, the simple question:    DOES MONEY RULE/ OR DO WE THE PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS AS PROVIDED AND GUARANTEED BY OUR CONSTITUTION, BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL?  The federal court loses the legal battle, and avoids obedience to the law, REFUSES democracy:   removing justice as is their jurisdiction and authority to provide/ returning this case to state court.  Discarding the 3rd article of the US constitution as demanded in trial:   throwing it in the trash!

 
in case 10 mr 766
excerpts serve the purpose better
THE GRIEVANCE, AND DEMAND:

2.       In the matter of:   FAILURE to adequately protect the citizens of these cities, this county, and our state of IL.  The opportunity and legal duty to abide within the primary understanding of government demands: WHERE “realities in fact” EXIST, THAT CAN potentially THREATEN, DAMAGE, MUTILATE, OR DESTROY,    LIFE IN THIS STATE.  There shall be an investigation of the facts/ an examination of EACH  risk/ and a distinct trial before the people.   So that they can and will make their decision: upon the reality, and truth of HOW shall we proceed?   Our lives, SHALL NOT be gambled with!

 It is not up to the police or the court to determine “scientific theory”!  Rather it is their DUTY to examine risk, and or the gambling with our lives, nature, planet, etc:   EVERY threat, that defines a clear and possible harm!  Even if it is very small: IT IS, our right to be protected/ when being wrong is horrendous, or severe.  It is our right to have examined a bomb for instance;  prior to its explosion: who doubts this?   Reality inferred by the evidence of, what might indeed happen: should we let this situation continue/ is cause enough to demand investigation and court actions.  In other words:   IF WE OR THEY CANNOT BE WRONG:   without doing substantial or extreme harm!  THEN THIS CANNOT BE DONE, there are no excuses.

The cause and consequence being: that we are being threatened by terrorists (those bringing severe or serious threats of harm into our lives).  Is, the courts, have inadequately responded to assure and sustain the life, health, property, children, and well‑being of those citizens represented here. That fact must be changed/ before it is too late.


The allegation: when EVEN THE CONCEPTION, of severe and serious threats exist:   that CAN IN FACT, by the nature and machinery of death: threaten our very existence, our ability to survive, our lives, our businesses, our everything called life.  IN THIS PLACE & within our future, and even our world: because the threat is that extreme, or less.  IT IS OUR DECISION TO MAKE AS A PEOPLE/ not theirs to gamble and assume. To play with our lives, to expose us to their own failures, to threaten everything: is terrorism!  We are known to be at the mercy of theory; with people who are, simply trying to play god!  People gambling with the laws of nature, time, and energy, that we depend upon for our survival.

 The foundation of that as legal demand for protection is:   “When you know”/  THEN these police, courts, and employees of the state of IL: being informed these threats do exist/ MUST INVESTIGATE/ EXAMINE THE FACTS/ DETERMINE THE RISK/ and let the people decide for themselves what they shall do, by participating in that courtroom, full disclosure of all that is truth and reality.  Thereby accepting our fate,  rests in the hands of ourselves.  RATHER than a few: WHO DO GAMBLE, and RISK EVERYTHING PRECIOUS: TOO ALL OF OUR LIVES!  This case proves:   you now know/ and cannot legally refuse.

  BY MOVING THAT THREAT INTO FULL DISCLOSURE, before the people: thereby,  ESTABLISHING THE CRITICAL REALITIES WHICH CAN OR COULD BE CONCEIVED AS RISK TO OURSELVES/ as gambling with our lives.   IS fundamental to the battleground;   called TERRORISM. To be involved in the decisions that can harm our world, as we the people: our right of authority as owners of this state and nation; is without doubt, THESE ARE,    OUR DECISION TO MAKE, no one is allowed to risk or gamble with our lives.  Our choice/ no one else.

  Demanding trial, instead of waiting, to be wrong/ and the people or world to be dead/ our nature destroyed/ or any other potential horrific reality that could occur. Is mandatory:  Redress of grievances presents these critical decisions to us all.   THEREBY, it is the proper tool for the prosecution of these risks.

Functionally the primary threats presented were, (in short):

 

THE NATIONAL IGNITION FACILITY, livermore CA

OUR LIVES THREATENED WITH EXTINCTION,

the  first theat!

YOUR american LEADERS/ YOUR university EXPERTS, gamble with this planet, at the national ignition facility:   BASED upon these theories (guesses/ expectations).  The machine exists/ the experiments are now running.  What is true, DETERMINES whether this entire planet lives or dies!


Not a game, because this is our reality; because this is the same fire as is on the sun/ the potential same result as is the sun, here on earth!

This trial is NOT about “the science”!

 Rather this trial for WE THE PEOPLE:   is strictly about the risk and reality of being wrong/ or being too late, a future destroyed; if we do not act now!

THEIR Theory #1

fusion cannot be sustained here, because the necessary gravity, hence pressures “to crush atomic materials, thereby attaining heat”:   are not possible to maintain for any significant period of time, on earth.

THEORY #2

thereby;   all fusion is generated from the center of the sun, (wherein tremendous pressures are believed to exist, BECAUSE OF gravity) and radiates out.

THEORY #3

GRAVITY, because the sun is considered to be so massive, is the cause of fusion.

 THEORY #4

gravity is: the evidence of a large body attracting a smaller body, thereby holding it by some form of unknown attraction.

Upon these four theories “of the extra special smart people”: they gamble bringing fusion to earth will not cause this planet to become as the sun is today;  completely engulfed with fire!

THEIR QUOTES:

1. WE WILL create an energy burst explosion: equivalent to 500 trillion watts or 1000 times the electrical generating capacity of this USA.

2. WE WILL achieve temperatures inside the target area of over 180 million degrees F.  “More, than an exploding sun”

3.  WE WILL create pressures equivalent to 1000 times greater than, the gravity of this earth, inside the target area.


 THEIR MACHINE: 192 of the most powerful lasers known/ all pointed at one single pinpoint spot called the target.

THEIR PURPOSE: to surround and encapsulate the atomic structure of whatever elements are inside that target, and make it surrender to their,  heat imposed.  “No escape”!  Thereby forcing the atomic laws that govern our existence here, to submit beyond their limits to resist:  changing that atomic law of time, governing earth.

THEIR GUESS: fusion will result/ THEIR EXPECTATION: but when we stop the lasers:  it will stop, because the pressures needed to sustain fusion; containing the atomic environment will cease.    More at www.justtalking3.info

IF THEY ARE WRONG/ AND THE FUSION STARTED CONTINUES WITHOUT PRESSURES INDUCED BY LASERS:

they have created a fire that cannot be put out, because everything here is fuel!

Are you willing to bet this planet on that theory?

 

 the SECOND MAJOR IMMEDIATE THREAT

to our planet:   the terrorists at CERN/ the particle accelerator buried in a mountain.

Their stated purpose:  “to recreate and study, the energies responsible for the BIG BANG”/ THE SINGLE MOST DESTRUCTIVE EVENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE.   Here on earth. IT IS, A gamble with this ENTIRE planet that is complex/ but understandable, if you try.

THESE “EXPERTS” ARE, attempting to demonstrate energies that led to:

  creating the structural defects that caused the originating mass to explode, and expand into the universe we know today.  We know structural weakening occurred because it is a documented explosion of. such force, that no doubt exists only “dust and gas” was left.

THESE scientists, ARE GAMBLING: they can create the same energies and use it as a toy to study: simply turning their machine back off, will mean nothing bad can happen.  They BELIEVE , THIS EARTH WILL NOT EXPLODE; EVEN THOUGH THEY EXPECT, intend and demand: THESE ARE  THE SAME ENERGIES, THAT DESTROYED THE ORIGINATING MASS, of an entire previous universe.  To be wrong then, is to create the destruction of this earth/ same energy, same result is not unlikely. Therefore we review their theories here. (IN BRIEF)  And demand: if even a one in a million or more chance exists the entire planet is destroyed: THIS MUST STOP!  IT IS, our lives/ our future/ our everything: NOT just yours.


 The THIRD immediate threat, TO LIFE.

NATURE IS, THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF LIFE!  It is not more than that or less than that.

 Nature is, the genetics that build our bodies, create our world, establish a fundamental base of knowledge by which we survive.  Combined with the energy necessary to establish and maintain movements, decision, and the comprehension called life.  THIS NATURE, the universities, industry, agriculture, medicine, and businesses, are mutilating across this planet;   as if it were a toy.

The foundation of their theory on genetic mutilation is:

1.  In the religion (cannot be proven) called evolution: evolution (we shopped/ we wanted/ we took for ourselves/ and it just worked, without even a brain)  builds  everything, “therefore life heals itself/ and we don’t have to care about anything”.  Even though these “scientists”,  say it took “a billion  years”.

2.  The primary goal of geneticists for the last fifty years has been:   IF WE CAN JUST MAKE GENETIC STRUCTURE “COLLAPSE AND BURN; so to speak”!  THEN, we will learn how to put it back together and take it apart: becoming creators of evolution ourselves/ WE will be gods.[ These scientists, HAVE done HORRIFIC things to life, in their laboratories, behind closed doors!]

That means, their perceived primary purpose is to destroy the integrity and disciplines that give us life.  The BALANCE, that gives us two arms/ eyes/ legs/ etc; same on both sides.

 Think about that!  Think about how your bones would be worthless without joints/ would be nothing but pain without lubrication/ would be useless, unless attached together in such a way with tendons and ligaments that you could move.  Would be a skeleton without muscles; lacking, the necessary; wrapped in a very specific order and attached so they could move, or without a mind to move them.  Can you not understand genetics give you a face, or a hand, or a foot; absolutely everything life represents: AND life,  LETS YOU USE THEM.

  Yet these are beyond even playing, calling life a toy/ THEY DEMAND death, so they can play god, and put life back together by their own design.   THEY ARE YOUR ENEMIES, FAR WORSE THAN ANY OTHER   “TERRORIST GROUP”. (equal to the top two threats) THESE TARGET EVERY LIFE IN THIS WORLD.    WAKE UP!

3.  The expectation of all medical genetics is:   IF WE SAVE THIS ONE/ then we will be great; no more tears!  The reality however is they are gambling with life and body for every single living biology on earth/ for the sake of only one, a tiny few.  That means “FOOL”!


 With tears and propaganda and temptation they declare GIVE US YOUR MONEY, so we can “wipe away every tear”.  But every DAMNED DOLLAR goes to genetic mutilation and the evidence of infecting this world with a tragedy we CANNOT recover from.  One wrong genetic mistake is an epidemic that can wipe out or change life on earth forever.  NOT a game/ NOT a need to know, no excuse for: therefore we must!  Because the fact of life is, the human population has grown so vast/ THAT WE CAN ONLY BARELY SURVIVE NOW; we have become, that devastating to nature which keeps us alive.  That means, like it or not, people do need to die.  Every life does need to be protected/ but NO LIFE deserves the possibilities that every other life will be  gambled away; because of just one, or a tiny few.  How is that NOT clear?  NOT A GAME, life or death for a world.  You ain’t god/ GROW UP. Death brings eternity, a few more days here represent nothing in comparison.  How is that, worth wrecking Creation?

And there are many more threats, that can easily exterminate us all from life on this earth!
THEIR CHOICE, one and all:   WE THROW YOU OUT OF COURT, WITH RIDICULE.

 

Case 09 LM 1414    Results from a contract dispute in the service of healthcare

In this case: I go to the emergency room, on a Sunday/ specifically asking: without ANY occurrence to believe otherwise.  That I do wish to see a doctor IF, YOU HAVE a service that DOES NOT include an emergency room visit: a more “outpatient” type of service as described.  They said yes/ I said alright then I will ask to see a doctor: and was subsequently charged for an emergency room visit that I distinctly said, with NO uncertainty that I did not want (I would wait till monday).  A contract broken.
That fact established again, a clear foundation of financial INEQUALITY/ between patient and the healthcare services: WHICH MUST be dealt with.  Consequently redress was sought here as well.   In summary: “Since our politicians, courts, businesses, etc; CANNOT find justice for us/ it is time we did so for ourselves”!    The court says no to REDRESS, our law, with ridicule and excuses; claiming it is not a guaranteed right of the state of IL constitution/ as does the court of appeals 4-10-0679/ the second circuit court trial/ the federal trial 10-2055/ the federal appeals trial 10-2146/ the state of IL supreme court 111868

THEY REFUSE; throwing redress, a foundation of our democracy:   in the trash.

Summary of 10‑853:   
In this court on April 20, 2011 during this trial 10‑mr 853; the single reality of this hearing is: that the plaintiff shall be informed, as to why the leaders of this state government called IL;   believe that they need not obey the constitution of this STATE, in this nation USA.  The defendant calls for this hearing fully knowing this trial;  is the cause called redress, for the people of this state of IL.  Therefore he or she shall give their answer to this people.  It is that simple. Explain is the constitution the law ruling our democracy/ our employees,  or not?


No other excuse shall be heard until this matter is resolved. A transcript will be bought, and published to inform the people of IL, as to exactly what you say.  The legal description of a constitution is: the exact agreement of the people and their heritage involved in creating the definitions of this our democracy called the state of IL.  Or more simply the limits and guarantees, that our employees owe to us, for the right to exercise or establish our needs as a society; by the introduction of law, work, taxes, and all that physical governments  mean.  A constitution is not “free reigns over us”/ a constitution is our control over you.  Therefore explain, why you fail? Believing yourselves to be rulers, rather than employees.  Simple as you can.
I REMIND THEM: as is true of all contracts:   IF YOU DON’T DO THE WORK WE EMPLOYED YOU TO DO/     THEN YOU ARE NOT OWED ANY MONEY, as in the collection of taxes.

THEY REFUSE, to honor the state, the people, the call for justice that is a courtroom of “LAW”; and adhere to the anarchy and rebellion that is constant in the judiciary.  Throwing redress in the trash.

 

IN SUMMARY: in this case 10-mr-906, the court of this state of IL; has been demanded, “you must obey the constitutional law called REDRESS, the fifth amendment to the IL constitution”.  Because anything less proves conspiracy/ corruption/ anarchy (seeking to destroy the law)/ rebellion (you have no right to refuse)/ tyranny (the expectation of a ruler, rather than an employee)/ terrorism (we are in crisis, and this is democracy you deny)/ and treason, the deliberate intent to refuse the people their right, to decide realities that do affect their lives, thereby govern themselves.

Prove the law.  Prove democracy.  PROVIDE REDRESS TO THIS PEOPLE!

The next step is: that the legislature MUST be involved/ and put on record.  That the political parties shall be informed/ that grassroots organizations must be notified/ and the propaganda press, be advised:  THE REFUSAL to protect the people, the environment, this democracy, and our very way of life on earth HAS consequences.
NOT A GAME, REDRESS IS THE LAW!  Plain and simple, you cannot legally refuse.
Plain and simple: the foundations necessary to insist that WE THE PEOPLE are in crisis/ that we are OWED OUR RIGHT, to govern ourselves; as we see fit in democracy served.  Cannot be denied either.  Not with a vote to vote for someone to vote for me/ but an educated vote, for myself/ ourselves:   established by the investigation of evidence, produced in a courtroom;   so as to understand and know what is or is not in the best interest of our state, our nation, and ourselves.  That is democracy served/ good or bad, its our decision.

 

 


PROOF OF SERVICE

I, James F. Osterbur do hereby declare: that I have sent a true and accurate copy of the foregoing/ to each of the following/ along with the court; to these addresses.  On this date 11/14/11.  First class postage prepaid in the US mail service.

         To the federal parties SIMPLY to avoid the excuse should redress occur/ that they were not informed, nor had opportunity to speak. Because federal redress SHALL occur, if the state responds according to the law.  They are then obligated to help me attain first amendment redress.  “You, are then not hidden anymore”.
Parties to the proceeding

FOR THE USA:   THE SOLICITOR GENERAL   ROOM 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania ave, NW   Washington DC 20530-0001
The originating defendants:
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
box 19281    Springfield IL 62794-9276
IL DEPT OF AGRICULTURE OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT.
Box 19281   Springfield IL 62794-9281
Environmental protection agency for the USA, Chicago office IL:
US EPA region 5 Ralph Metcalfe Federal building   77 W. Jefferson blvd Chicago IL 60604
Department of OSHA for this USA.  Chicago area
701 Lee st.   Suite 950   Des Plaines IL 60016
Department of traffic safety for IL
box 19245   Springfield IL 62794-9245
Department of human rights;   100 W.  Randolph st.  Chicago IL 60601-3218
added is
US ATTORNEY Gerard A. Brost   211 Fulton st.  Suite 400,   Peoria IL 61602
STATES ATTORNEY office Champaign county 101 E. Main st.  Champaign/ Urbana IL 61801
IL ATTORNEY GENERAL   500 S.  Second st.  Springfield IL 62706

added as lawyers for the defense was: 
IGNACIA S. MORENO    Lawyer for epa requesting electronic filing from court/ no address to me.
AMY J. DONA     Lawyer for US dept of justice/ environmental and natural resources division/ environmental defense section   box 23986   Washington DC 20026-3986
THE GOVERNOR, for the state OF IL, PATRICK QUINN
207 state house,   Springfield IL 62706