In the circuit court of IL
Sixth judicial circuit
Champaign county

judge CHASE LEONHARD
FILED THIS DATE:    2/19/10

case 09LM1414

James F. Osterbur (pro se)     V.       Provena Covenant Medical Center as represented by Daniel P. Slayden/ Hinshaw and Culbertson/ Joliet Il

and the doctor billing in question/ and subsequent defendent; added later/ which the court has not formally  addressed. 

RE:   DISMISSAL by the court without law.  Filing 2/ 16/10

1.)  Plaintiff states unequivocally:   I shall not refile/ YOU SHALL PRESENT ME WITH THE LAW, AND YOUR SIGNATURE AS JUDGE IN THIS CASE AS FILED.   I paid for a legal ruling/ and I demand a legal ruling with substance and foundation/ NOT FRIVOLOUS EXCUSES, and an attempt to evade duty just because you do not wish to support my LEGAL FIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

Plaintiff DEMANDS AN ASSOCIATION OF MERIT, TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGES RULING:   which clearly states what it is the judge or the defendant DOES NOT understand!  It is IN FACT, and by the reality of justice within a courtroom:   that the judge MUST understand what is spoken in plain english within his courtroom/ or HE IS NOT worthy of his job.  Nor is he in compliance with the duties required of his work.  FRIVOLOUS complaints are not welcome, and evict the purpose of the law, from this courtroom.   That is an illegal act!  The purpose of this courtroom:   IS TO IDENTIFY what is fair, what is equal standing for a dispute between citizens and others: UNDER THE LAW.   The law is not a procedural antidote, for anything you don’t wish to deal with/ THE LAW IS MY RIGHT TO BE HEARD, and I do call upon the court to provide the leniency due to a non lawyer in a courtroom of law.  Be specific/ or understand the failure to represent the citizen is an outright defiance of JUSTICE IN AMERICA/ and the intent to be a traitor to my rights under the constitution.  Not a game!   Thereby I have a right to know exactly and without reservations, exactly what it is you do not understand: BE SPECIFIC.   Therefore I say to you specifically “I do not understand what you mean by:    “simply incomprehensible from a legal standpoint”.   Therefore as you say to me/ I now say to you:   it is your job to insure I have my FAIR AND LEGITIMATE DAY IN COURT!   And that means it is YOUR DUTY, not mine to assure that I have a reasonable and fruitful description of EXACTLY WHAT YOUR COMPLAINT IS ALLEGED TO BE.  That is my right under the law, to be fully and completely informed as to my accuser and what he states is my fault.    STATE YOUR CASE/ and support it with law, and foundations that will prove JUSTICE. For this nation.   Or back away, and send this matter to trial,   MARCH 1, 2010.  AS SCHEDULED! An opinion without legal merit or standing has no place in the law or this case.  Try again!  Remove this abortion of the law/ due process/ and guaranteed citizen rights:   and return to dignity rather than disgrace.

  IS THAT NOT, “your job” / your job is to grant me;   ALL INHERENT AND LEGAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS WRITTEN WITHIN THE LAW.    YOUR JOB, is to state the foundations of law that must exist before you can dismiss my rights as identified below.  Your job is to answer every question that has legal standing in this case.  Your job is to recognize and support that I, “a non lawyer” DO HAVE RIGHTS AND LEGITIMATE ACTIONS THAT ARE served by the courtroom under DUE PROCESS according to the constitution:    OR YOU ADMIT TO, the disgrace and disease of a job purely to entertain and support the existence of power over this people, and this nation/ RATHER AS   supporting WE THE PEOPLE OF THIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!  

Consequentially, the foundation of your complaint lacks legal merit, and is a ruse to undermine the value of this complaint and assert that you need not follow the law or obey the critical truth of your own oath as a judge in this United States of America;   TO SERVE JUSTICE, IN A COURTROOM OF LAW, upon the lives and sanctity of democracy as the constitution allows.    That would suggest you are moving, toward a criminal action/ which would be to dismiss my rights as a plaintiff under the law.  And because I am not an attorney I state to you prove you do not understand/ by submitting the questions that provoke your own attack on me.  State and defend your right to humiliate this courtroom and defy the law.  OR SURRENDER to case management as is sent to you/ and begin to serve the rights and realities of law as the constitution provides.  The failure to do so, understands;   A CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED, and actions will follow to resolve that in media and law. 
Contrary to this statement of disgrace/ this trial is NOT a game.  Nor will I be played for a fool, or allow simple desertion of the fundamental guaranteed rights provided by law to me.  PROVE BY THE LAW, THAT I AM WRONG/ or begin this trial on March 1, 2010 as has been scheduled.  I have waited long enough! 

PROVE YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND! STATING SPECIFICALLY WHY YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND!  THAT IS MY DUE, AS A NON LAWYER IN THIS COURTROOM IN THIS NATION, BY THE LAW!

  OR GIVE ME THE LAW, TO PROVE YOU ARE A BASTARD LIAR, AND FOOL:     UNDER THE LAW.  STATING IN EFFECT, THAT YOU WILL NOT OBEY THE LAW, as written by those superior to you.  The founders and foundation of our nation.   That is my/ our guaranteed right, as citizens of this land!  Prove you are acting under the grant of due process, in service to this people by your attempt;   at frivolous and inconsequential and stupid.   Prove you have a right to enter any judgment without the law!  Prove my discontent with the court or government of this nation is NOT without truth and respect for our reality as a nation!  Prove my right to court is not MORE IMPORTANT, MORE LEGALLY CORRECT, THAN ANY FORM OF DISMISSAL!   Regardless of “a circuit clerk ruling”/ as is your assumption that I will accept.   I DO TOTALLY REJECT any assertion that I shall change this complaint/ and demand the law itself, instead!
I DO REFUSE:   procedural disgrace, without a clear and understandable; PLAIN ENGLISH” VERSION of what it is that you hereby submit you do not understand!  I submit to you, the assertion of intelligent, MEANS written with good comprehension and clarity!  AND STATE I PAID YOUR PRICE, FOR A JUDICIAL SIGNATURE BASED UPON THE LAW/   NOT a procedural criminal action intended to pursue the treason of  SELLING my rights as a citizen of this nation to the defendant in any form.    YOU state I have a command of english in your filing/ therefore PROVE you do not understand the command of english you have provided to me.  THERE IS A LIE, hidden in that statement!  And you stand in a courtroom of law/ and are subject to its penalties!  PROVE YOUR DECISION HAS MERIT.  PROVE YOUR FAILURE IS NOT A DIMENSION OF CORRUPTION AND CONTEMPT FOR THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE, that you represent.  PROVE you are NOT a criminal selling democracy to the highest bidder; to the power and pride and selfishness that is formed from the reality of healthcare and assumptions of money today.

    SIGN YOUR WORK/ establish it in writing; so that NO misunderstanding can exist!  And prepare for trial; either this one/ or yours: to determine if you will remain on that bench by the law, and the people!  There is no hiding, or running away.

2.)   ANY further assertion, that the court does not have the authority to allow democracy in action as WE THE PEOPLE assembling our means of petition, for legal redress of grievances against the threats that we now endure as a reality of failure in government/ SHALL NOT be tolerated.  It is the law, and the law is the purpose of this court and every court within this land. 
ANY assertion that to petition these legal rights in a courtroom of law is somehow,   not within the courts jurisdiction IS A LIE. As the foundation of this complaint comes down to twelve jurors who shall decide if the county of Champaign can or cannot be asked:    Do you believe we need to assert our ownership of this nation and take responsibility for our lives and our future for ourselves.   IT IS OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, AND FOUNDATION AS A NATION/ and I say to you, any judge who denies that fact will answer to this people.

ANY ASSERTION, that neither the plaintiff nor the jurors have a right to assemble a legal petition beginning at the base level of one citizen and growing by the demand and verdict of a vote assembled by the peoples themselves.  Or to pay for that vote if they so choose, within a jury of citizens fully informed; it will not be free: this is a return to reality and truth, or you fail.  This is a decision   to take responsibility for our own nation, and accept the consequences:  or not.  Even if,  our current employees of government may be seen as necessary: living with lies is not / to DEMAND A TRUE AND ACCURATE ACCOUNTING FROM our employees at every level, PRIOR to any  action: is a function of wisdom.  To destroy the nation with lies, cheating, and stealing:  REEKS OF TREASON.   The assumption that behind our backs you can lie, cheat, and steal/ and even take away our guaranteed right for redress of grievances/ our rights AS OWNERS OF THIS NATION/ our democracy as WE THE PEOPLE.  Shall not be tolerated.
ANY ASSERTION this is not as the constitution has demanded WILL fall on deaf ears/ and must be proven by this court as errant/ or become observed as a part of life in these United States.  Prove me wrong/ or stand by the law, as written/ as people died defending and preparing for such a situation as we are in today!  There is no denying cause/ its on the news and throughout society everywhere; and shall not be tolerated as an excuse.

 But before you CHOSE your fate as within the law/ or as a criminal in contempt of the law, trading the lives of WE THE PEOPLE for your own failures without law. Understand this:   your filing states the plaintiff is intelligent/ and a clear warning is;   I do intend to uses the law to remove you from the practice of law, in its every form;   by public comprehension of failure and the disease of a courtroom that is not defined by “the public interests/ OR constitutional law”.   If I can/ should you fail to reconcile this decision.   Prove me wrong/ or return to life under constitutional law, and discard this filing/ and return to court and proceed with case management as described to you.

The elemental foundation of redress is this: that we are a nation of owners, and that when clear and significant threats arise, it is OUR DUTY to resolve these:   WITH faith in democracy/ trust in the law/ truth by the examination of evidence/ and a reality that will not be deceived.  For the sake of the children.  For the reality of life and nation. For the sanctity and happiness of an entire world, blessed with the removal of every threat that can carry out extinction against us.   WE ARE OWED, this opportunity to choose as    WE THE PEOPLE!

Make your decision.

So that all people and this court:   are clear, and the path forward is simple:   do to the public aspects of this case, that are not simply personal/ but DO reflect the needs and values and laws of a nation.  Should I die/ this case is given over to WE THE PEOPLE.  Defended by:   those who prove to the public of Champaign county: that they have LIFE FIRST, according to the constitution; as their guide. (By public vote; because our vote matters, and WE WILL take on the court itself:   to establish the law of the first amendment to OUR CONSTITUTION;   or take them away to prison.  So say I to you, should I die; that is your job as life in this USA). DO IT NOW.  That those chosen may defend WE THE PEOPLE & themselves against corruption, and the disgrace of failure/ the threats of extinction/ and the enslavement of men, women and children, by a nation sold into bankruptcy and left for dead by its employees.        USE THE LAW/ NOT A GUN!  Or you will fail.