Case 11-2111. A case wherein I demand redress of grievances from the state/ demanding federal law must enforce it and remove or punish the judge who refuses IL constitutional law. The defense argues dismissal “complaint did not state a cause of action and was frivolous and without merit”. “Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”. Lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Judge immune from obeying the law.
The defense argues sanctions: “Frivolous and patently without merit”. Rule 11 “all parties a responsibility to file papers ....a reasonable basis in fact and law..” Then “frivolous, legally unreasonable, without factual foundation, or asserted for an improper purpose.” “A barrage of unintelligible filings....incomprehensible and frivolous”. And so on. Decide for yourself. Read the case/ read this site (recent lawsuits listed below) and the other sites I provide. Let yourself understand who is actually vexatious, frivolous, legally unreasonable, and without factual foundation, thereby using the court for an improper purpose. Understand these two documents are not yet filed in court....they are testing to see what I will do/ threatening, “sign your name to a court document”; and there will be consequences. A threat that does not recognize the law called justice. If they continue not to file, I will be filing them as plaintiff exhibit A. Refusal to respect the court, by the defendant: that is contempt. What are you going to do? “He, signed his name”.
THE NUMBER of cases presented: establishes corruption/ collusion/ conspiracy/ denial of law/ obstruction to democracy/ disrespect and disgrace to WE THE PEOPLE. And does notice treason, traitorous behaviors, and willful predetermined betrayal of our society and system of government. In the court, of this state and this nation.
In terms of the outstanding cases 10-2277 and 11-2023 if they are dismissed: I WILL be filing an appeal, up to the supreme court. And I WILL be filing a legal demand: take me to court over the 2005 taxes owed, NOW/ and prove you have as government employees: DONE YOUR CONTRACTUAL DUTY, ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION. Because if you refuse to do what you are being paid for/ the job you swore to do. THEN I NEED NOT PAY ANYTHING, UNTIL YOU DO YOUR JOB. I don’t get paid for refusal to do what I stated and swore by contract I would do. THEREFORE YOU DON’T EITHER; “Its called justice”/ the right of fair play, and equal position in a court of law. ITS CALLED TAX REVOLT!
If I am refused access to the court/ or the tax bill is not deleted entirely from my name (I cannot argue a debt they declare I don’t owe). I will be going to media and community members, who I do suspect shall join me in insisting “he must pay/ take him to court”. While they watch.
the US supreme court replies/ my response is; that rule 10 reads: review of a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. Possible reasons given include: the US court of appeals has entered a decision ........so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this courts supervisory power. There is no motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; as most pro se filings are (no check included, because it had no chance of going through on the first try in particular. It will be included in the next filing.) The clerk of the court states: this filing does not contain the reasons relied upon for the allowance of the writ. Rule 10 and 14.1 (h). Read for yourself, and decide if this is true.
Rule 14 states “a direct and concise argument amplifying the reasons relied on for allowance of the writ”.