IN US DISTRICT COURT
For the central district of IL
Urbana IL 61801

James F. Osterbur
2191 county road 2500 E.  St. Joseph IL 61873
Vs.
United States of America
Internal Revenue Service/ dept of the Treasury; 1500 Pennsylvania ave NW   DC  20220
the Solicitor General   ROOM 5614, Department of Justice,
950 Pennsylvania ave, NW   Washington DC 20530-0001
the Attorney General   US dept of Justice 10th and Constitution avenues NW Washington DC 20530
the President Barrack Obama;   1600 Pennsylvania ave NW , DC 20500

dated: 1/ 7/ 11                                       trial number: 10-2257

AMENDED COMPLAINT

LET IT hereby be known, that in the interest of justice, democracy, duty, and honor:   the foundations of constitutional law as are being tested here in this courtroom.  I  Accept and declare that it is within the best interest of WE THE PEOPLE of this state called ILLINOIS, and this nation called the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, be included in this trial.  Having the same rights, is without doubt:   as this is the law of redress on trial.  The foundation of our relationship as owners, to those we employ to do our business of government.
The purpose of trial here, is to enforce the law/ and provide legal redress of grievances to these people and to myself.  NOT by my actions/ but because it is the law.  THE LAW is not subject to discretion/ it is compulsory!  That means, NO JUDGE, in this state or this nation has a right to reinterpret this law in any form other than what it distinctly meant for us, “we the people” as both state and nation.  It is a felony offense, to steal our laws/ and there is absolutely NO IMMUNITY from penalty in those actions.  There is in fact a guaranteed penalty, due to the oath of office required of those whose deliberate job is to enforce that very law, without menacing it!

We have come to the point of trial, wherein it is clear: the foundation of each argument has been tested/ the reality of viewing, as is the truth of our democracy and the honor of our judiciary showing/ and the clear need for intervention as is the purpose of redress has been established for both state and nation.  That means it is now “our trial, as we the people”/ RATHER than the listed plaintiff/ appellee;   James Frank Osterbur.  Therein this formal notice of change, has been defined/ the creation of deliberate inclusion for the purpose of democracy in action, as we the people: FUNDAMENTALLY PROVEN a right of this people.
I the plaintiff/ appellee:   James Frank Osterbur do hereby relinquish the full and complete right of “joint trial” to “we the people, of this state and nation; as is their right in pursuance of the laws, guarantees, and fundamental constitutional ownership owed.  Their destiny as a people, called the legal right of:   first amendment, redress of grievances/ state guaranteed legal redress as well. 
Joint trial means:   with full legal rights and responsibilities, for the pursuit of justice, ownership authority, and democracy;  through the guarantees of our constitution.  That will include the right to provide or submit their own lawyers as would be fitting to this trial, within the guidelines of redress, and all it can mean.  BUT IT WILL NOT include a greater right than is mine, James Frank Osterbur:   the primary plaintiff/ unless killed.  Yours is to inherit the guaranteed rights of constitutional law.  Mine is to establish the fundamental  foundations, purpose, and desire as it seems legally clear and personally necessary to do.  There is no compromise, the constitutional law of both state and nation,  is the law. For the state of IL