As usual it begins with ridicule, including their description of “an absolute absence of standards”. (Even though the standard presented in trial is the constitutional guarantee of redress) clearly refused by the judges involved.
This judge has proven an understanding with clear knowledge of the parameters; he therefore, “met his daunting task, and passed”. Until they get to page 2. Where the failure begins.
Instead of the usual rant about frivolous and incomprehensible, (they are being careful now). This judge applies that my intent is a legal tax revolt so the citizens of IL can enforce their democracy. Adding my statement: like us, “if you don’t do the work/ you don’t get the money”. This is correct except for the judges interpretation that this is somehow errant or wrong, it is democracy as intended by those who lived and died for this nation. That is of course what redress of grievances is about. In addition to that, the judge clearly intends to redirect the reality of this trial away from REDRESS FOR US ALL/ and point to me, and the tiny issue of personal taxation. Not the purpose of this trial at all, merely the price of court. The only individual reality applied.
Page 2; having an audience in court on that day composed of an entire class of journalism students (20-30), with dean in tow from the U of I; a short introduction was valid. But not to the point it became the reason a courtroom was required in this instance. I came to court/ I advised the court/ and I made it absolutely clear to the judge and the defense: my purpose in attending this hearing was to discuss my guaranteed and inherent rights of redress of grievances under the constitution of IL. The judge used my introduction “so the class, would be somewhat informed/ because they clearly were not”; and he stopped the hearing before it could proceed, to the stated purpose of trial. I talked roughly one minute/ hearing over. NO REFERENCE or allowance for 5th amendment rights under the IL constitution. The law denied. That is using the courtroom to avoid the law/ and disgrace the people of this state; it is an anarchy. Because we the people do have a right to their guarantees, or an explanation of why that guarantee is wrong. Instead of guaranteed constitutional right: the judge declares “frivolous and patently without merit.” Using his bully pulpit as a means to control society, and me. That is illegal, as this is our courtroom, not his.
The lies begin with the assumption I am looking for a way to delay collection of taxes. I am not, it simply adds penalties and interest. I AM LOOKING FOR MY GUARANTEED RIGHT OF REDRESS, before this people in this state of IL, as the constitution provides. The judge looks for an excuse NOT to provide it, which is an act of treason, because it is a direct defiance of our law, and our right as a democracy, to expect and demand the guarantees to each one shall be carried out. That denial or more correctly subversion; is traitorous, and in fact anarchy (warring against us).
Our law, our constitution provides redress of grievances/ and employees no matter who they are, are NOT above the law. We provide to ourselves our guarantees, as the means to protect this democracy from those who would steal it from us. Redress is that law of protection, providing to the people, we get to have the final say; in this our government. If we legally raise the question/ and demand the answer shall be an accountability to us; for our decision as the jury in charge. The judge wants no part of democracy, and insists on power shall rule.
Page 3. The court claims by interpretation (he and all involved on the defense absolutely refuse to mention redress as law, or constitution) that redress of grievances is not a “ claim upon which relief can be granted”. The judge claims that an act so blatantly devoid of the law as to assume and demand that a constitutional guaranteed right has no basis or foundation in a courtroom; “Is not illegal for the judge to do, therefore the judge is immune”. I disagree, the legal right of every citizen in this state is on the line in this judgment, and in this case; that is more than enough to “colorize it”; and demand a true judgment that establishes constitutional law for the people. They refuse, admitting to nothing about redress of grievances, apparently “redress is a plague” to them. Nonetheless, it is our right, regardless of their concerns; the law is the law. They have no foundation for denial, and therefore lie.
That is not an insubstantial claim. Redress is either a guaranteed right to each and every citizen with legal consequences in democracy, or it is not. The constitution says it is/ the judge rules against this democracy. The conspiracy of many courtrooms who do exactly the same proves corruption, and coercion in the judiciary against us all. Simple and plain.
As to the tax revolt and political process. The foundation of this lawsuit was and remains plain: the demand REDRESS SHALL BE OBEYED, the constitutional right to demand accountability from our government officials shall be accepted OR WE OWE NO MONEY. To those who steal from us our law, and our protection provided by the constitution as redress, or steal our democracy. That is neither frivolous nor incomprehensible., it is a matter of public concern: to determine who is lying/ cheating/ and stealing our money and our democracy; for their own purposes.
From accountability through investigation, examination of the results, and fundamental acceptance of the evidence; the political process is resolved. Yes they did the best they could, OR THIS leads to criminal results, and we must look to criminal court as our response. Liars/ thieves/ cheaters/ traitors/ conspiracy and more belong in a courtroom.
Those who enforce the collection of money that is NOT being used in the true and resolute methods of public government for the good of the people and this democracy/ are thugs, being used to extort and control the people for crime. To assess who is correct, and who is honoring this people, IT IS absolutely necessary to examine the people who do collect the money; so as to understand WHAT WENT WRONG. Because as we all know, the state of IL in terms of money, is a shambles/ and we are bankrupted by those who claim “they are just doing their job”. The fact is: bankrupting us all/ IS NOT THEIR JOB, or their right to exercise control of that accounting; or covering up the facts of this case with more lies and innuendo or removal from the court.
I demand an accounting, through redress of grievances/ my only recourse to do so; my guaranteed right according to the IL constitution. They refuse. Simple as that, until you recognize: that is an ILLEGAL ACT.
An act that is clearly the result of a judiciary in absolute conspiracy to deny redress of grievances both state and federal through corruption, coercion, and denial of constitutional law. That is treason, the act of a traitor/ the assembled response of a judicial army clearly warring against the nation, and its democracy by refusing we the people, our guaranteed rights. That is anarchy.
They could back away from their treason at any time/ granting redress to the people as the constitution provides. They do, continue to refuse, and that makes them all, an army which has infiltrated our ranks, and chosen to fight against our nation and state. How is that not terrorism, the demand to destroy our democracy as written, and provided; for the people? The political parties involved here, and in other cases; all have the same opportunity to provide to the people their right of redress/ they too refuse, because they do have the power of office to demand this shall be so. And do not, how is that not aiding and abetting the enemy? The law is the law, even a judge cannot refuse the law, or change it: OR with pre-mediation and the act of conspiracy deny it. This type of decision; is not less than criminal contempt against the nation and state itself. That is the law.