IN THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT
WASHINGTON DC
JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR petitioner pro se
2191 county road 2500 E. St. Joseph IL 61873
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA represented by
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
DEPT OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, US MILITARY, ALL BRANCHES
A PETITION DECLARING TREASON, a cause and right of the American people to be
protected by their own government.
THE QUESTION PRESENTED IS:
The constitution DEMANDS our protection from those who would and do gamble with our
lives. The right of the people to be protected/ to be guaranteed a future, their lives and
property, their nature and world: is NOT A GAME. Therefore theory or any other
expression that can result in critical or absolute harm: SHALL NOT BE DONE! THE
LAW OF PROTECTION FOR THE PEOPLE, for this nation is inherent and cannot be
defeated by any form of "chosen risk": UNLESS the people themselves choose it by vote.
YES OR NO!
THE RIGHT, of the people to be completely informed about ANY critical risk/ that could or
would be conceived as a potential for great harm: IS THEIR CHOICE TO MAKE. NO
ONE, shall make these choices for them. Thereby first amendment redress of grievances is an
absolute right/ a foundation for accountability against those who have corrupted OUR
GUARANTEES, established in this United States of America, by the Constitution.
YES OR NO!
AN ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ACTION, within Article 3 of the US constitution.
CONCLUSION: substantially prove the evidence of threat is wrong/ DEMAND our
lives shall not be experimented with. Prove a theory (they don't know), IS SUFFICIENT to
risk life/ nature/ environment/ planet, or any other destructive or horrendous possibility. Prove
"our employees"; of this nation called , WE THE PEOPLE/ do not owe us, the public citizen:
"Accountability"!
Table of contents
page 1; GRANTED and established by the immediacy and horrendous threat we face.
Page 1: DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE ACTIONS by the court, to protect this nation
page 2 the cause and consequence of trial/ argument begins
page 3 The reality of this trial
page 4 The demand to "exterminate our risks"
page 5 Respect for our lives, and our law
THESE REQUIRE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
page 6-9 The most immediate threat
page 9-13 The second most immediate threat
page 13-18 The third most extreme threat we face
THESE REQUIRE SECONDARY ATTENTION,
immediately following resolution of the first three
Subsection Threat
page 18 1 the threat called healthcare
page 19 2 the threat called antibiotic livestock feeds
page 19 3 The threat called antiseptic/ and poison
page 20 4 Factory ships on the ocean
page 20 5 Over population
page 20 6 Our pollinators are dying
page 21 7 Our water supplies are being robbed and destroyed
page 21 8 Oxygen is being consumed beyond its possible replenishment for fire
page 21 9 Oxygen production in the ocean is dying
page 22 10 Ocean destruction will leave one billion people starving. The coming
world war
page 22 11 Our economy prepares us for civil war
page 23 12 We cannot sustain resource depletion/ it means "we are dead".
page 23 13 Immense wars against life, on our earth, have been created
page 24 14 Weapons of mass destruction IS A DECISION we the people shall
make
page 24 15 The US supreme court and its defendants in 08-1339 deny the law.
liars exist in government and media.
page 26 16 Evolution is nothing, but a religion/ which has invaded and
controlled this government illegally.
page 27 ARGUMENT BEGINS
The development of who is to blame, begins with the university
diploma/ are they NOT in charge? The alternative is as
WE THE PEOPLE: CHOOSE the law.
page 28 EMINENT DOMAIN
page 29 The actions of our employees in all forms of government are
required to protect this people.
page 29 This trial is RISK to our lives: not science and theory! The
burden of proof, is upon those who wish to risk our lives, IN FUL L
AND COMPLETE DISCLOSURE.
Page 30-31 Our right as a nation, to decide: by public vote on the real issues of life.