trial statement


                            The introduction

IT IS, fundamental to this trial; that a reality of assembly be presented.                                   Trial: 2018 TR 5950

I, James Frank Osterbur: have in fact spent my lifetime in pursuit of methods by which this planet will survive. Extreme threats do exist. Redress of grievances IS the only answer we have! Because, IT IS THE LAW, and that means we can enforce it as a democracy unleashed. OUR LIVES = OUR CHOICE.

Forty plus years have taught me: people believe whatever they want/ regardless of truth. That includes who you are willing to trust. I say to you: trust the evidence, NOT me or them! Let what is true/ the consequences of being wrong;  decide.

Make no mistake, I don’t have a university degree (someone to testify, “he memorized and will do what he has been told to believe or do”). What I offer instead is reality, as defined by the evidence which can be understood: even by you, through a courtroom dedicated to finding what is true, about the risks we face!

The critical test is:  are you willing to gamble this entire planet and all its life? Because that is exactly what the universities are doing. The most extreme is: trying to ignite atoms on fire, just like the sun. Same energy release/ same result; even if they are just .0000001 wrong. We all burn the same. It is no game, and there are no second chances once ignition occurs. We CANNOT extinguish a 10 million degree fire/ it burns atoms for fuel. So you must decide IF, “they could be WRONG”? Because OUR world itself, is at risk!

There are many extreme threats, such as genetic mutilation takes over life: forever. Because DNA is nature (IT BUILDS LIFE, AS A BODY); and your universities are diligently trying to remove genetic stability, disciplines, order, balance, and more: so they can learn how to play god. What they will learn instead is:  WE ARE, now all dead/ life cannot go on! This is not a hard concept: life is not a game to be played with. How is that not true?

The purpose of trial is simple: to establish the power of democracy, which is, “we the people OWN this nation, and can choose for our own future; by the law called redress of grievances! Your choice, is to give that right/ that option of democracy by law: to the PEOPLE of this state or nation or even this world. In terms of whether:  we all decide, to allow extreme threats to simply be allowed/ or reality discarded as it is today.

To understand the risk, and make our own decision about what we will allow or investigate or be discarded:  by our own decision, for this state, nation, or world and our combined future. IS A FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL RIGHT of democracy itself!

Your leaders, and their universities, do nothing but play games: hiding from the consequences of what they don’t want to believe. Fighting for what they want, regardless of truth. That reality, is not subject to want/ it is defined only by truth! IT MUST BE, controlled by the consequences of being WRONG.          Nothing more deliberate is here, and there are NO ulterior motives. Simply, THIS WORLD cannot survive as we are. To lose this fight, is to allow our world to die.

The fight is:  TO INVESTIGATE, AND IDENTIFY what is true, regarding each and every threat that is so extreme, “catastrophe, is literally NOT, a big enough word”.  BELIEF, Is not sufficient: we must know as best we can, the consequences of being wrong. Simple as that. OUR CHOICE: is now! Once the point of no return has pasted, there is no going back. No tears/ no prayers/ no exceptions:  like death; the deed is done. How is that not true?


Trial: 2018 TR 5950




THIS IS an elemental case of constitutional guarantees to the citizenry.

It confronts you, as a result of whether or not it is FAIR; to use a minor tax: to INSIST on my day in court. As a member of this society demanding democratic (we the people) need, exists.

The foundation is redress of grievances; a first amendment right found in the US constitution, and a fifth guaranteed right, found in the state of IL constitution. Each represents the true power called, WE THE PEOPLE.

As established by the law:

  1. A society grievance (our democracy is failing). Is presented as a legal right to peacefully assemble for the purposes of claiming: a constitutional democratic authority. As is constructed by we the people: have found a need to intervene in our union; through our own legal decision as necessary. This requires a courtroom, and a vote:  as no individual is a democracy/  yet we all own “this society and its direction”! Our employees do not own the right of absolute authority/ they are employees.
  2. To legally petition “the government”: which is, we the people under constitutional guidelines. By establishing courtroom procedures and the right as we the people to legally investigate the claim of disparity or other grievances, such as extreme threat. By lawful means, our decision is, to understand as best we can: what is true/ and what it means to be wrong; the consequences of a decision that affects our lives/ our future/ our world.
  3. To establish that threat or other, for the purpose of a vote by all the people; willing to accept their own responsibility for sustaining and protecting the nation or state itself. Even our world! Requires full disclosure, as begins with communicating “we do have a legal right, called ownership: to intervene in this decision (as outlined and established by trial)”. As owners of our state, or our nation. As true participants in our world!
  4. To attain this level of democratic governmental authority; among, we the people: united for a common cause. There must be an acceptance of the need to intervene or investigate: which requires a “citizen vote”. To demand a full public trial, to establish what is true; and then decide for ourselves. Or not.
  5. There must be all necessary opportunities to honestly search, and correctly be informed by the evidence; and its witness. As we search for the truth, and its consequences; no excuses allowed. Because it is a decision: which will then impact, change, or threaten our lives. Thereby deserving of our own legal decision, as a democracy enlarged.
  6. The judicial power of our government is limited by “good behaviors”/ as a judge may never attain the right or authority, of “king or queen or god”. They are limited to constitutional reality, as employees; a consequence of we the people, own this/ not you. Our democracy is ours! The critical understanding of democratic law is: a union only because we have agreed to these contractual (constitutional) terms. Simple as that.
  7. Constitutional law dictates: we the people are united, by the common causes as are outlined in the preamble of this United States of America. It reads:

We the people of the USA, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the USA.


The value of your decision in this day, forms the ultimate truth of what the declaration of independence actually means: “to decide for ourselves, when we must”! Because we are “the owners here”! The right of freedom, is an inherent duty (we are responsible); a decision, and a reality of choice that belongs then, to each one. As is represented by law/ NOT war.

So the true question presented in this trial is:

  3. DO WE TAKE CONTROL OVER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: BY DEMANDING WORLD LAW, over leaders. Governing them: INSTEAD of letting extreme weapons exist?
  4. DO WE DECLARE OURSELVES BANKRUPT; AND CONTROL THAT REALITY, as “we the people”: before those with power to do so, destroy our lives and force us into civil war.
  5. DO WE PROTECT OUR WORLD, AS BEST WE CAN/ or let it fail?
  6. DO WE LET TRUTH DECIDE, or continue with fantasies/ counterfeiting/ failure/ and fools (you knew better) to decide?
  7. DO WE CHANGE OUR WORLD, BY UNDERSTANDING AND ACCEPTING: we live in a finite environment. Human decision; especially over population, HAS CHANGED our future. Unless we stop ourselves, there is NO future! Not for a single life on earth.

As a jury, your decision is NOT to decide what is true: for the nation or state. YOUR decision is to decide for our democracy, IF THERE SHALL BE A VOTE; as we the people.  Your decision is then: Whether or not sufficient cause exists to demand from this court, that they shall invite, and communicate to the people. They themselves shall VOTE: upon the democratic decision to demand trial for themselves. To legally choose to investigate and determine by the evidence: WHAT CAN OR CANNOT BE DONE, in this nation/ state/ or world. As a people united by ownership of that right. CHOOSING then, as a nation or state: the decisions, we CAN intervene in; as a democracy. As a people united to form our own destiny or fate by the authority of legal, democratic action.

  1. That our democracy (we the people) have a legal authority, and a guaranteed right to claim ownership. Over these decisions presented.
  2. That extreme experiments exist, and it is your individual decision: as a state or nation or world; we MUST NOT let these few be WRONG! THE PRICE is too high.
  3. That extreme weapons exist, and it is your decision: as a nation, we must not let these few be WRONG. The price is too high.
  4. That the future is bleak, as proven by the evidence of our reality. Overrun with catastrophe, by the consequences of things we will not be able to change later/ unless we accept our own responsibility to do better. RIGHT NOW!
  5. That a jury, even one which represents all the people in this nation or state or world: can make a decision that will change the direction of our leaders/ even our world. By accepting the responsibility for those decisions among ourselves.


For the purposes of this simple jury trial, I submit that previous filings shall be left alone, until public trial. So that the more simple decision can be applied:     do you proclaim for the people, that they should be given the opportunity to vote? If so: thereby you as a jury demand to determine by democratic authority “the direction and level of risk” our nation, state, or world will allow, or must go? Taking responsibility for our own lives.  AS ONE PEOPLE, united; as best we can! Governed by truth, through democracy.

I will suggest: that the web sites which I have provided; beginning with or linked through  are sufficient for an initial discovery of public information about threats to be dealt with. The ad should so state.

In the alternative, you as the initiating jury; for the nation or state; accept the consequences of whatever being wrong, shall bring! No excuses, no second chances: let the universities (every leader has a diploma) decide.


To the court:  I intend to bring 18 copies (enough, or make it clear a need for more exists) with me for trial presentation to the jury. Let the prosecutor be so informed.

Limited response will be brought by me. Closing argument as needed.



James Frank Osterbur

Dated:  July 3, 2018


Trial: 2018 TR 5950

STATE OF IL     VS         JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR                                                                                                                                                              THE CLOSING ARGUMENT

That reality is not a game, and the consequences of making the wrong choices: are catastrophic or deadly!

Our reality is:

Scientists are trying to burn plasma now, because fusion has been proven wrong. Burning plasma means: “they are literally trying to create a nuclear fire, by igniting atoms on fire”. As is what happens on the sun. Same energy/ same result here, as is on the sun!  OUR WORLD BURNS.

Scientists claim: they need not worry about extinguishing the fire because they declare, “not enough gravity here” so the fire will just put itself out! Wrong is a dead earth, turned into a sun.

Scientists claim: they know what happens inside the sun. But they have absolutely NO instruments or any like thing that can see within a million miles of solar flame: so they are in fact, SIMPLY GUESSING; WITHOUT any proof whatsoever. 1. That the sun core is the hottest place on the sun, and it burns continually. In contrast: if in fact the sun was on fire completely from the core out. THEN ALL THE FUEL IS ON FIRE AT ONCE, and the sun would burn out quickly. Simple as that.

  1. That the sun core is made out of gravitons, an element that cannot be proven to exist by any known element or physical fact. Merely a hypothesis. A graviton is said to be 15 times bigger than a lead atom: which means by size comparison, if lead was an atom the size of a marble/ a graviton would have to be the size of a basketball. A reality that does not exist. Solar gravity exists because of the fire itself, than can be proven true!
  2. That the sun is made primarily out of hydrogen: based upon spectrographic results. Which can only “see” the ash cloud coming out of the fire. We CANNOT see within “million mile long flames”; simple as that. But we can understand thermodynamics: which demands room for heat (energy expansion) to exist.

While it is possible to ignite atoms on fire (just like on the sun)/ it is impossible to extinguish that fire. Everything is fuel!

          CONSIDER THE CONSEQUENCES, and demand a moratorium, to investigate what can be proven true.


          The foundation of genetic structure is: NATURE ITSELF! Simple as that, as genetic information builds and controls the body of life in every living thing. The geneticists when asked years ago: HOW will you repair what you damage? Their response was “we need not bother, in a few billion years/ evolution will bring something else back to life. YOU WANT TO WAIT, or be destroyed: for that?

Everything about evolution is a lie, other than adaption: which is in fact the sign of “perfect (I knew it would be needed, so I prepared) design”. Take a look into the nursing home to learn: what it means to have even a little less than what we are born to be. Chaos builds nothing: it simply destroys everything down to its most simple state. NOT LIFE HERE.

Resources determine our work, our world, and our lives as a living state of existence. It is said that we use more resources in ten years, than in all of human history before us. No resources NO LIFE.

Human population is increasing at not less than one billion more lives to feed per decade. We eat living things; we need water; EXCETERA. Cannibalism is coming: reality proves that true.


To understand: we have changed our world, by becoming 8 billion people (no one argues we will get there). Respecting that reality means: YOU CANNOT simply have whatever you want anymore. Because this earth is a very finite place. That truth dictates: without true and serious change, life on earth shall end and soon.

As a jury you have the option to call upon society: to investigate the costs of being wrong. As a society: they have the right to examine those costs, and make changes for themselves; in order to survive.

Nothing more or less, is given as a true purpose for this trial. Make your decision: give life its chance/ OR, take their chance, to understand our reality; by taking away, their choice-.  Simple as that!


James Frank Osterbur


The constant of my lifetime is:  people want what they want/ and they sure as hell DON’T want nothing to do, with what they don’t want! Simple as that. So we are here today at the edge of extinction; because that is what you, as humanity on earth chose. But you have nowhere to run or hide, and time has run out for less than true and appropriate change. Last chance for life on earth:  CHOOSE LIFE COMES FIRST, not want. And we can begin again in ways that will let us all survive IF that is possible. No going back/ no second chances/ no appeal for this case. CHOOSE!

author avatar
Jim Osterbur

Leave a Reply